ArticleThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2018
Malposition of the Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Venous Cannula in an Accessory Hepatic Vein.
Article in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case Report: Possible causes and management decision-making for near-180° fold-back kinking of a VA-ECMO venous drainage cannula.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Intraperitoneal malpositioning of an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannula: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2025Article
- Point-of-Care Transesophageal Echocardiography in Emergency and Intensive Care: An Evolving Imaging Modality.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Rare complication of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannula misplacement into the hepatic vein: A case report.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) cannula malposition identified with point-of-care ultrasound.The ultrasound journal · 2024Article
- Liver Injury Due to Penetration of the Common Iliac Vein by an Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cannula.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a case of a refractory cardiogenic shock secondary to myocardial infarction in a 70-year-old patient requiring femoral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). At initial transesophageal echocardiography, the venous cannula tip was seen in the inferior vena cava (IVC), but not in right atrium. On day 8, ultrasonic examination identified that the end of the venous cannula was in the hepatic vein (HV). Despite such malposition, no disturbance in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) venous return was observed. Moving or replacing the cannula was considered a high-risk maneuver potentially resulting in hepatic laceration with hemoperitoneum. Because of adequate venous drainage, allowing sufficient blood flow, venous cannula repositioning was delayed until day 10, when a ventricular defect was repaired and ECMO was weaned off. At the time of VA-ECMO implantation, the venous cannula has to be positioned in the right atrium using real time echo monitoring. Visualization of the guide wire in the IVC but not in the right atrium is insufficient to ensure appropriate venous cannula positioning. Indeed, either accidental catheterization or cannula migration into the HV is possible during ECMO. Health care professionals dealing with ECMO have to be aware of this possible malposition, to correct it and prevent insufficient venous drainage or traumatic complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30250343PMC6146273W3004949482What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.