Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30250262›Full record

ReviewNature neuroscience2018

Selective vulnerability in neurodegenerative diseases.

Hongjun Fu, John Hardy, Karen E Duff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 355 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
355citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

355 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Recovery from disorders of consciousness: Lesions and GABAergic modulation in a biologically inspired spiking neural network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Natural history of 441 cases of bulbar onset motor neuron disease (MND) in China: a single-center retrospective study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  7. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

295 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hongjun FuTaub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain; and Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5346-7075
John HardyDepartment of Molecular Neuroscience and Reta Lilla Weston Laboratories, Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Karen E DuffTaub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain; and Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. ked2115@columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6177-868X

Funding

Tauopathy in AD and FTD - Molecular Determinants of Phenotypic DiversityRF1AG056151 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CARLSON, GEORGE A., DUFF, KAREN · 2017 to 2017
$4.1M
Spatio temporal relationship of pathology and functional decline with tauopathyR01NS074874 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DUFF, KAREN · 2011 to 2015
$2.3M
Investigating the vulnerability of WFS1-expressing excitatory neurons to tau pathology in early Alzheimer's disease.K01AG056673 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FU, HONGJUN · 2017 to 2021
$625k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG056673NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG056151NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS074874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases have two general characteristics that are so fundamental we usually take them for granted. The first is that the pathology associated with the disease only affects particular neurons ('selective neuronal vulnerability'); the second is that the pathology worsens with time and impacts more regions in a stereotypical and predictable fashion. The mechanisms underpinning selective neuronal and regional vulnerability have been difficult to dissect, but the recent application of whole-genome technologies, the development of mouse models that reproduce spatial and temporal features of the pathology, and the identification of intrinsic morphological, electrophysiological, and biochemical properties of vulnerable neurons are beginning to shed some light on these fundamental features of neurodegenerative diseases. Here we detail our emerging understanding of the underlying biology of selective neuronal vulnerability and outline some of the areas in which our understanding is incomplete.

Indexed as

AnimalsGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeurons

Identifiers

PMID30250262
PMCPMC6360529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.