Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30249945›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology2019

Prevalence of Congenital Anomalies in the Japan Environment and Children's Study.

Hidetoshi Mezawa, Ai Tomotaki, Kiwako Yamamoto-Hanada, Kazue Ishitsuka, Tadayuki Ayabe, Mizuho Konishi, Mayako Saito, Limin Yang, Narufumi Suganuma, Fumiki Hirahara and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Breastfeeding and Children's Cognitive Development up to the Age of 4 Years: The Japan Environment and Children's Study.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hidetoshi MezawaMedical Support Center for the Japan Environment and Children's Study, National Center for Child Health and Development.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5151-164X
Ai TomotakiMedical Support Center for the Japan Environment and Children's Study, National Center for Child Health and Development.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8891-7950
Kiwako Yamamoto-HanadaMedical Support Center for the Japan Environment and Children's Study, National Center for Child Health and Development.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1288-9620
Kazue IshitsukaMedical Support Center for the Japan Environment and Children's Study, National Center for Child Health and Development.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2944-7012
Tadayuki AyabeMedical Support Center for the Japan Environment and Children's Study, National Center for Child Health and Development.
Mizuho KonishiMedical Support Center for the Japan Environment and Children's Study, National Center for Child Health and Development.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1255-3644
Mayako SaitoMedical Support Center for the Japan Environment and Children's Study, National Center for Child Health and Development.
Limin YangMedical Support Center for the Japan Environment and Children's Study, National Center for Child Health and Development.
Narufumi SuganumaDepartment of Environmental Medicine, Kochi Medical School.
Fumiki HiraharaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine.
Shoji F NakayamaJapan Environment and Children's Study Programme Office, National Institute for Environmental Studies.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7772-0389
Hirohisa SaitoMedical Support Center for the Japan Environment and Children's Study, National Center for Child Health and Development.
Yukihiro OhyaMedical Support Center for the Japan Environment and Children's Study, National Center for Child Health and Development.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aims of the present report were to estimate the prevalence of congenital anomalies (CAs) among infants in Japan using data from the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS) and to evaluate the validity of CA classification within JECS.

methodsData on CAs were collected at delivery and at age 1 month from the medical records of 101,825 infants at 15 regional centers. The analyses focused on 61 CAs, selected on the basis of reported associations with environmental exposure. Prevalence per 10,000 pregnancies (including miscarriages, stillbirths, and live births) was stratified according to four reporting patterns (at delivery, at age 1 month, at either, and at both). To evaluate the accuracy of observed CA prevalence, the medical records of 179 cases from a single JECS regional center underwent independent, retrospective re-evaluation.

resultsThe prevalence of major CAs in four reporting patterns (at delivery, at age 1 month, at either, and at both) was 2.4, 2.6, 3.5, and 1.4 for myelomeningocele/spina bifida; 4.3, 4.2, 5.3, and 3.2 for cleft palate; 18.1, 17.4, 19.5, and 15.1 for cleft lip with or without cleft palate; 73.4, 100.3, 120.8, and 52.8 for congenital heart disease; and 10.5, 14.1, 15.0, and 9.6 for Down's syndrome, respectively. In the subsample re-evaluation, CA diagnoses were confirmed for 92.7%, 93.3%, 90.5%, and 97.8% of cases in the four reporting patterns (at delivery, at age 1 month, at either, and at both), respectively.

conclusionsThe present report generated reliable data concerning the prevalence of major CAs in JECS.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesCongenital AbnormalitiesEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornJapanMalePregnancyPrevalenceProspective StudiesRisk Factorsbirth cohortcongenital anomaliesJapan Environment and Children’s StudyJECSprevalence

Identifiers

PMID30249945
PMCPMC6556438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.