ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2018
Mortality after deferral of treatment or no treatment for choroidal melanoma.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uveal Melanoma: 5-Year Update on Incidence, Treatment, and Survival (SEER 1975-2020).Ocular oncology and pathology · 2025Article
- Prognostic impact of MALs and potential immunotherapy targets in uveal melanoma.Pediatric discovery · 2024Article
- Article
- Polarization-Diversity Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of Choroidal Nevi.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- Validation of the Prognostic Usefulness of the Gene Expression Profiling Test in Patients with Uveal Melanoma.Ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Decoding tumor heterogeneity in uveal melanoma: basement membrane genes as novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets revealed by multi-omics approaches for cancer immunotherapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Machine learning to construct sphingolipid metabolism genes signature to characterize the immune landscape and prognosis of patients with uveal melanoma.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Prognostic and Functional Analysis ofDisease markers · 2022Article
- Uveal Melanoma: Refusal of Treatment.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2021Article
- Nation-Wide Trends in Incidence-Based Mortality of Patients with Ocular Melanoma in USA: 2000 to 2018.International journal of general medicine · 2021Article
- Eye plaque brachytherapy versus enucleation for ocular melanoma: an analysis from the National Cancer Database.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2020Article
- Response Evaluation of Choroidal Melanoma After Brachytherapy Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI): Preliminary Findings.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Is Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) still relevant?Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2018Article
- Metastatic Choroidal Melanoma Presenting as Neovascular Glaucoma.Case reports in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report mortality of patients who were eligible for enrollment in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) clinical trials of medium-sized choroidal melanoma or large-sized choroidal melanoma but chose to defer treatment or receive no melanoma treatment.
designProspective nonrandomized multicenter cohort study as an adjunct to COMS randomized clinical trials.
methodsPatient follow-up procedures included examinations, correspondence, telephone contacts, and National Death Index searches. Primary outcome was patient death measured by all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were melanoma treatment and melanoma metastasis.
resultsOf 77 patients eligible for COMS clinical trials who chose to defer or receive no melanoma treatment, 61 were appropriate candidates and 45 (74%) enrolled in the natural history study (NHS). In all, 42 patients (42 eyes) had medium melanoma, and the median follow-up was 5.3 years (range, 4-10.7 years). In all, 22 patients (52%) had subsequent melanoma treatment, and 20 (48%) had no melanoma treatment. For the 42 patients, Kaplan-Meier estimate of 5-year mortality was approximately 30% [95% confidence interval (CI), 18%-47%]. For COMS medium melanoma trial, 5-year mortality was 18% (95% CI, 16%-20%), not statistically significantly different from the NHS patients. After adjusting for differences in age and longest basal diameter, the 5-year risk of death for NHS patients versus COMS trial patients was 1.54 (95% CI, 0.93-2.56). Three patients had large melanoma. Melanoma metastasis was confirmed or suspected in 8 (42%) of 19 deaths.
conclusionGreater mortality and higher risk of death for NHS patients are probative but not conclusive evidence of a beneficial, life-extending effect of medium melanoma treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.