ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2018
Is Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) still relevant?
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Threshold analysis of mortality outcomes in the collaborative ocular melanoma study (COMS).Melanoma management · 2025Article
- The Effects of Oncological Treatment on Redox Balance in Patients with Uveal Melanoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Choroidal Melanoma: A Case Series From Malaysia.Cureus · 2022Article
- Article
- Prognostic Biomarkers in Uveal Melanoma: The Status Quo, Recent Advances and Future Directions.Cancers · 2021Review
- Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Documented Anterior Uveal Melanoma Regression after Ruthenium-106 Plaque Therapy.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2021Article
- Current molecular and clinical insights into uveal melanoma (Review).International journal of oncology · 2021Review
- Malignant choroidal melanoma with vitreous seeds: supported by histopathology and field emission scanning electron microscopy study.Romanian journal of ophthalmologyArticle
- Surgical treatment of uveal melanoma: Exoresection versus endoresection.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.