Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30249774›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

From mechanobiology to developmentally inspired engineering.

Donald E Ingber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Microengineering 3D Collagen Hydrogels with Long-Range Fiber Alignment.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Mechanobiology of the female reproductive system.Reproductive medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Donald E IngberWyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA don.ingber@wyss.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4319-6520

Funding

Lung-on-a-Chip Disease Models for Efficacy TestingUG3HL141797 · NHLBI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI INGBER, DONALD E · 2017 to 2018
$2.8M
Mechanotransduction analysis in a microengineered lung-on-a-chipR01EB020004 · NIBIB · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI INGBER, DONALD E · 2015 to 2018
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS UG3 HL141797NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of mechanobiology emerged based on the recognition of the central role that physical forces play in development and physiology. In this article, which is based on a lecture I presented at the 2018 Royal Society meeting on Mechanics of Development, I review work from my laboratory carried out over the 40 years which helped to birth this field. I will also describe how we are leveraging the fundamental design principles that govern mechanoregulation to develop new experimental tools and organ-engineering approaches as well as novel mechanotherapeutics.This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Mechanics of development'.

Indexed as

BiophysicsEmbryonic DevelopmentMechanotransduction, CellularAnimalsEmbryo, MammalianEmbryo, NonmammalianModels, Biologicalmechanicalorgans-on-chipstensegritytissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID30249774
PMCPMC6158204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.