Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30249741›Full record

ArticleGenome research2018

The genomic architecture and molecular evolution of ant odorant receptors.

Sean K McKenzie, Daniel J C Kronauer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sean K McKenzieLaboratory of Social Evolution and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8238-4735
Daniel J C KronauerLaboratory of Social Evolution and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10065, USA.
Rockefeller University · US

Funding

Genetics and Cell BiologyT32GM066699 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI STRICKLAND, SIDNEY · 2004 to 2021
$7.6M
Studying the molecular mechanisms of social life using a novel ant model systemDP2GM105454 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI KRONAUER, DANIEL · 2012 to 2012
$2.5M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS DP2 GM105454NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM066699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The massive expansions of odorant receptor (OR) genes in ant genomes are notable examples of rapid genome evolution and adaptive gene duplication. However, the molecular mechanisms leading to gene family expansion remain poorly understood, partly because available ant genomes are fragmentary. Here, we present a highly contiguous, chromosome-level assembly of the clonal raider ant genome, revealing the largest known OR repertoire in an insect. While most ant ORs originate via local tandem duplication, we also observe several cases of dispersed duplication followed by tandem duplication in the most rapidly evolving OR clades. We found that areas of unusually high transposable element density (TE islands) were depauperate in ORs in the clonal raider ant, and found no evidence for retrotransposition of ORs. However, OR loci were enriched for transposons relative to the genome as a whole, potentially facilitating tandem duplication by unequal crossing over. We also found that ant OR genes are highly AT-rich compared to other genes. In contrast, in flies, OR genes are dispersed and largely isolated within the genome, and we find that fly ORs are not AT-rich. The genomic architecture and composition of ant ORs thus show convergence with the unrelated vertebrate ORs rather than the related fly ORs. This might be related to the greater gene numbers and/or potential similarities in gene regulation between ants and vertebrates as compared to flies.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsAntsAT Rich SequenceGene DuplicationInsect ProteinsReceptors, OdorantRetroelementsInsect ProteinsReceptors, OdorantRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID30249741
PMCPMC6211649
OpenAlexW2893048401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.