Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30249611›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2018

GPs' experiences and perceptions of early detection of liver disease: a qualitative study in primary care.

Holly C Standing, Helen Jarvis, James Orr, Catherine Exley, Mark Hudson, Eileen Kaner, Barbara Hanratty

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. The egyptian clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of metabolic associated fatty liver disease.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD): assessing the knowledge and practice of primary care doctors in Seremban District, Negeri Sembilan.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Holly C StandingFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne.
Helen JarvisInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne.
James OrrLiver Unit, Freeman Hospital, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne; Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne.
Catherine ExleyFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne.
Mark HudsonLiver Unit, Freeman Hospital, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne; Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne.
Eileen KanerInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne.
Barbara HanrattyInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne.
Newcastle University · GBNorthumbria University · GBFreeman Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of liver disease is increasing in the UK and primary care is a key setting where improvement in the detection and management of liver disease is required. Little is known about GPs' understanding and confidence in detecting liver disease.

aimTo explore GPs' experiences of liver disease with a focus on early detection and interpretation of liver function tests (LFTs). DESIGN AND

settingA qualitative study employing semi-structured interviews of a purposive sample of GPs from five UK primary care study sites.

methodTelephone and face-to-face interviews of GPs were undertaken. Data were analysed thematically, using a constant comparative approach.

resultsFrom a total of 25 GP interviews (

conclusionLiver disease is not perceived as a priority in primary care. If GPs are to take on a greater role in identification and management of liver disease, support is needed to promote awareness, knowledge, and confidence.

Indexed as

Early DiagnosisPrimary Health CareAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicLiver DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Qualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationUnited Kingdomearly diagnosisgeneral practiceliver diseasesliver function testsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID30249611
PMCPMC6193778
OpenAlexW2893951313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.