Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30249589›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2018

Improving Prediction of Risk of Hospital Admission in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Application of Machine Learning to Telemonitoring Data.

Peter Orchard, Anna Agakova, Hilary Pinnock, Christopher David Burton, Christophe Sarran, Felix Agakov, Brian McKinstry

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peter OrchardPharmatics, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1330-9528
Anna AgakovaPharmatics, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3722-0843
Hilary PinnockUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5976-8386
Christopher David BurtonAcademic Unit of Primary Medical Care, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0233-2431
Christophe SarranMet Office, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0605-8839
Felix AgakovPharmatics, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4280-9062
Brian McKinstryUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9581-0468
University of Edinburgh · GBMet Office · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office ARPG/07/03Medical Research Council MC_PC_13062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelemonitoring of symptoms and physiological signs has been suggested as a means of early detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations, with a view to instituting timely treatment. However, algorithms to identify exacerbations result in frequent false-positive results and increased workload. Machine learning, when applied to predictive modelling, can determine patterns of risk factors useful for improving prediction quality.

objectiveOur objectives were to (1) establish whether machine learning techniques applied to telemonitoring datasets improve prediction of hospital admissions and decisions to start corticosteroids, and (2) determine whether the addition of weather data further improves such predictions.

methodsWe used daily symptoms, physiological measures, and medication data, with baseline demography, COPD severity, quality of life, and hospital admissions from a pilot and large randomized controlled trial of telemonitoring in COPD. We linked weather data from the United Kingdom meteorological service. We used feature selection and extraction techniques for time series to construct up to 153 predictive patterns (features) from symptom, medication, and physiological measurements. We used the resulting variables to construct predictive models fitted to training sets of patients and compared them with common symptom-counting algorithms.

resultsWe had a mean 363 days of telemonitoring data from 135 patients. The two most practical traditional score-counting algorithms, restricted to cases with complete data, resulted in area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) estimates of 0.60 (95% CI 0.51-0.69) and 0.58 (95% CI 0.50-0.67) for predicting admissions based on a single day's readings. However, in a real-world scenario allowing for missing data, with greater numbers of patient daily data and hospitalizations (N=57,150, N

conclusionsEarly detection and management of COPD remains an important goal given its huge personal and economic costs. Machine learning approaches, which can be tailored to an individual's baseline profile and can learn from experience of the individual patient, are superior to existing predictive algorithms and show promise in achieving this goal.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN96634935; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN96634935 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/722YkuhAz).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsFemaleHospitalizationHumansMachine LearningMalePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality of Lifechronic obstructive pulmonary diseasemachine learningtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID30249589
PMCPMC6231768
OpenAlexW2809115447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.