ArticleThe Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology2018
Hepatic fine-needle aspiration cytology: The role of rapid on-site evaluation in the assessment of hepatic lesions.
Article in The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of USG/CT-Guided FNAC With Rapid On-Site Evaluation in Nodular Liver Lesions: Cytology-Histopathology Correlation.Diagnostic cytopathology · 2026Article
- Article
- Distribution of Genomic Testing Resources by Oncology Practice and Rurality: A Nationally Representative Study.JCO precision oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsRadiologically guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of internal organs is not cost-effective. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of smears by a cytopathologist can improve the diagnostic yield of FNACs and save time and money by reducing the need for repeat procedure/biopsy. To determine the role of ROSE in the diagnostic outcome of hepatic lesions by comparative analysis of FNAC with and without ROSE by a cytopathologist. MATERIALS AND
methodsHepatic FNACs were retrospectively analyzed over two separate time periods from January 2011 to June 2013 and from January 2015 to July 2016. Smears from 2015-2016 were subjected to ROSE by a cytopathologist after staining with toluidine blue for 1 min to assess adequacy of the material. Final report was given after hematoxylin and eosin, May Grünwald Giemsa, and Papanicolaou staining were performed. Chi-square test (non-parametric) was used to determine if there was a statistically significant increase in the diagnostic yield with ROSE.
resultsDuring 2011-2013, of the 160 radiologically guided FNACs for hepatic lesions, 22 were non-diagnostic, whereas during 2015-2016, of 142 radiologically guided hepatic FNACs, only six were non-diagnostic. With the application of ROSE, there was a statistically significant increase in the diagnostic yield of hepatic FNACs from 86.25% to 95.8% (p=0.015).
conclusionROSE performed by a cytopathologist using toluidine blue can increase the diagnostic yield of hepatic FNACs and reduce the cost of healthcare by eliminating the need for a repeat procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.