Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30249499›Full record

ArticleDental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials2018

Glass ionomer cements with milled, dry chlorhexidine hexametaphosphate filler particles to provide long-term antimicrobial properties with recharge capacity.

Candice A Bellis, Owen Addison, Angela H Nobbs, Peter F Duckworth, James A Holder, Michele E Barbour

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Candice A BellisOral Nanoscience, Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, UK.
Owen AddisonSchool of Dentistry, University of Birmingham, UK.
Angela H NobbsOral Microbiology, Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, UK.
Peter F DuckworthOral Nanoscience, Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, UK; ACCIS, University of Bristol, UK.
James A HolderOral Nanoscience, Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, UK; Kemdent, Purton, UK.
Michele E BarbourOral Nanoscience, Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, UK; Pertinax Pharma Ltd., Bristol, UK. Electronic address: m.e.barbour@bristol.ac.uk.
University Of Bristol Dental Hospital · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGlass ionomer cements (GICs) are a versatile material, offering the opportunity for ion exchange with the oral environment. The aim of this study was to develop a GIC that delivers a controlled, rechargeable dose of chlorhexidine (CHX) over an extended period without compromising mechanical properties.

methodsGICs were supplemented with finely milled particles of chlorhexidine hexametaphosphate (CHX-HMP). CHX release into artificial saliva was measured over 660 days, and recharge with CHX and CHX-HMP was investigated. Mechanical properties were investigated, and an agar diffusion test was carried out to assess antimicrobial properties using Streptococcus mutans and Scardovia wiggsiae.

resultsDose-dependent CHX release was observed, and this was ongoing at 660 days. Compared with related studies of GICs containing CHX-HMP, the fine, dry particles resulted in fewer adverse effects on mechanical properties, including tensile, compressive and biaxial flexural strength, with 1% CHX-HMP GICs indistinguishable from control specimens. The GICs could be recharged with CHX using both a conventional CHX digluconate solution comparable to commercial mouthrinses, and a suspension of CHX-HMP of equivalent concentration. Recharging with CHX digluconate increased subsequent CHX release by 50% compared with no recharge, and recharging with CHX-HMP increased subsequent CHX release by 100% compared with no recharge. The GICs inhibited growth of St. mutans and Sc. wiggsiae in a simple agar diffusion model. SIGNIFICANCE: These materials, which provide sustained CHX release over clinically relevant timescales, may find application as a restorative material intended to inhibit secondary caries as well as in temporary restorations and fissure sealants.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalBifidobacteriumChlorhexidineCompressive StrengthDrug CombinationsFlexural StrengthGlass Ionomer CementsMaterials TestingParticle SizePhosphatesSaliva, ArtificialStreptococcus mutansTensile StrengthAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineDrug CombinationsGlass Ionomer CementshexametaphosphatePhosphatesSaliva, ArtificialAntimicrobialsCariesChlorhexidineGlass ionomer cementRestorative materials

Identifiers

PMID30249499
PMCPMC6280122
OpenAlexW2891948163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.