Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30249481›Full record

ReviewTrends in plant science2018

Perspective on Wheat Yield and Quality with Reduced Nitrogen Supply.

Christian Zörb, Uwe Ludewig, Malcolm J Hawkesford

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
23.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 303 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian ZörbInstitute of Crop Science, Quality of Plant Products (340e), University of Hohenheim, 70593 Stuttgart, Schloss Westflügel, Germany. Electronic address: christian.zoerb@uni-hohenheim.de.
Uwe LudewigInstitute of Crop Science, Nutritional Crop Physiology (340h), University of Hohenheim, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany.
Malcolm J HawkesfordRothamsted Research, Plant Sciences Department, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, UK.
University of Hohenheim · DERothamsted Research · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P016855/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/C/00005202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wheat is an important cereal crop with a high demand for nitrogen (N) fertilizer to enable the grain protein accumulation that is necessary for baking and processing quality. Here, perspectives for the development of improved wheat genotypes with higher yield stability, better grain quality, and improved N use efficiency to lower environmental impacts are discussed. The development of improved wheat genotypes, for example, genotypes that lack storage proteins that do not contribute to baking quality (e.g., by genome editing), in combination with appropriate N fertilizer management to prevent N losses into the environment underpins a novel approach to improving N use efficiency. This approach may be particularly applicable to wheats grown for animal feed, which have lower quality and functionality requirements.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalGenotypeNitrogenTriticumNitrogenenvironmentnitrogennitrogen use efficiencyNUEqualitywheatyield

Identifiers

PMID30249481
PMCPMC6202697
OpenAlexW2890657717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.