ArticleJournal of hematology & oncology2018
A phase Ib study to assess the efficacy and safety of vismodegib in combination with ruxolitinib in patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis.
Article in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02593760 (A Phase IB/III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Vismodegib in Combination With Ruxolitinib Versus Placebo and Ruxolitinib in Patients With Intermediate- or High-Risk Myelofibrosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase IB/III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Vismodegib in Combination With Ruxolitinib Versus Placebo and Ruxolitinib in Patients With Intermediate- or High-Risk Myelofibrosis
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of Ruxolitinib-based combination therapy in the patients with Myelofibrosis (MF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Hedgehog Signaling Pathway in Fibrosis and Targeted Therapies.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Non-canonical Hedgehog signaling mediates profibrotic hematopoiesis-stroma crosstalk in myeloproliferative neoplasms.Cell reports · 2024Article
- Systematic dissection of coordinated stromal remodeling identifies Sox10Cell stem cell · 2023Article
- Myelofibrosis.Blood · 2023Review
- Role of JAK inhibitors in myeloproliferative neoplasms: current point of view and perspectives.International journal of hematology · 2022Review
- The hedgehog pathway in hematopoiesis and hematological malignancy.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- The Role of Smoothened-Dependent and -Independent Hedgehog Signaling Pathway in Tumorigenesis.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- AXL Inhibition Represents a Novel Therapeutic Approach inHemaSphere · 2021Article
- Targeting cancer stem cells for reversing therapy resistance: mechanism, signaling, and prospective agents.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2021Review
- Finding a Jill for JAK: Assessing Past, Present, and Future JAK Inhibitor Combination Approaches in Myelofibrosis.Cancers · 2020Review
- Mechano-therapeutics: Targeting Mechanical Signaling in Fibrosis and Tumor Stroma.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2020Review
- Management of challenging myelofibrosis after JAK inhibitor failure and/or progression.Blood reviews · 2020Review
- Ruxolitinib-based combinations in the treatment of myelofibrosis: worth looking forward to.Annals of hematology · 2020Review
- New Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis.Current treatment options in oncology · 2019Review
- Advances in potential treatment options for myeloproliferative neoplasm associated myelofibrosis.Expert opinion on orphan drugs · 2019Article
- Standard care and investigational drugs in the treatment of myelofibrosis.Drugs in context · 2019Review
- Beyond Ruxolitinib: Fedratinib and Other Emergent Treatment Options for Myelofibrosis.Cancer management and research · 2019Review
- Precision immunotherapy, mutational landscape, and emerging tools to optimize clinical outcomes in patients with classical myeloproliferative neoplasms.Hematological oncology · 2018Review
- Managing myelofibrosis (MF) that "blasts" through: advancements in the treatment of relapsed/refractory and blast-phase MF.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe JAK inhibitor (JAKi) ruxolitinib is standard treatment for myelofibrosis (MF), but some patients are unresponsive. Pre-clinical and clinical data suggest that addition of a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor (HPI) to ruxolitinib might improve response. Vismodegib is an HPI approved for treatment of locally advanced and metastatic basal cell carcinoma. The MYLIE study assessed the safety and efficacy of combining ruxolitinib with vismodegib in ruxolitinib-naive patients with MF and characterized the pharmacokinetics (PK) of vismodegib in this setting.
methodsIn this phase Ib study, ten patients with intermediate- or high-risk primary or secondary MF received open-label vismodegib (150 mg/day orally) and ruxolitinib (15 or 20 mg orally twice daily, depending on baseline platelet count) for up to 48 weeks, or until withdrawal or discontinuation. PK samples were collected throughout the study for comparison with other patient populations. Efficacy outcomes at week 24 included spleen response (≥ 35% reduction in volume by imaging) and improvement in bone marrow fibrosis by central and investigator assessment, symptom response (≥ 50% reduction in Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom score), and anemia response (per International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment revised response criteria).
resultsAs of November 17, 2017, eight patients had completed 48 weeks of treatment with vismodegib and ruxolitinib; two discontinued treatment early. At week 24 (± 1 week), three patients experienced a spleen response by central review and no patients showed a 1-grade improvement in bone marrow fibrosis by central review. Five patients experienced symptom response at week 24, and no patients experienced an anemia response. The most common adverse events were muscle spasm (100% of patients), alopecia (70%), dysgeusia (50%), thrombocytopenia (50%), and nausea (40%); these events were predominantly grade 1/2. Three patients experienced a total of six serious adverse events.
conclusionsThe combination of vismodegib and ruxolitinib was tolerable and no new safety signals were seen, but there was no evidence that the addition of vismodegib to ruxolitinib improved any of the efficacy outcome measures assessed. Further evaluation of this combination will not be pursued.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02593760 . Registered November 2, 2015.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.