Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30249229›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2018

Developing internal medicine subspecialty fellows' teaching skills: a needs assessment.

Jakob I McSparron, Grace C Huang, Eli M Miloslavsky

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Just-in-Time Teaching (JiTT) Screencasts: a Randomized Controlled Trial of Asynchronous Learning on an Inpatient Hematology-Oncology Teaching Service.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Bringing the Teaching Close to Home: Implementation of a Near-Peer Model for Introductory Hematology-Oncology Fellowship Lecture Series.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Chalk Talks for the Clinical Setting: Evaluation of a Medical Education Workshop for Fellows.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jakob I McSparronDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, 3916 Taubman Center, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Grace C HuangDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Eli M MiloslavskyDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkey Center for Outpatient Care, 55 Fruit Street, Suite 2C, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. Emiloslavsky@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0008-8105

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor academic physicians, teaching represents an essential skill. The proliferation of educator training programs aimed at residents and medical students signals the increasing commitment of training programs to develop teaching skills in their trainees as early as possible. However, clinical fellowships represent an important opportunity to advance training as educators. In addition to enriching the pipeline of future teachers, developing fellows as teachers augments the training experience for more junior trainees and may impact patient care. Fellows' needs for programs to improve teaching skills have been largely unexplored.

methodsWe conducted a multi-institutional needs assessment of internal medicine (IM) subspecialty fellows to gauge interest in teaching and improvement of teaching skills. We surveyed IM subspecialty fellows at three academic medical centers about their access to fellow-as-teacher programs and other mechanisms to improve their teaching skills during fellowship. We also elicited their attitudes towards teaching and interest in training related to teaching skills.

resultsOne hundred eighty-three fellows representing 20 programs and nine different subspecialties responded to the survey (48% response rate). The majority of participants (67%) reported having no specific training focused on teaching skills and only 12% reported receiving regular feedback about their teaching during their fellowship. Seventy-nine percent of fellows anticipated teaching to be part of their careers, and 22% planned to participate in medical education scholarship. Fellows reported a strong interest in teaching and programs aimed at improving their teaching skills.

conclusionsThe majority of fellows reported a lack of mechanisms to advance their teaching skills as fellows, despite anticipating teaching to be an important aspect of their future careers and having strong interest in such programs. Our findings at three academic medical centers confirm a lost opportunity among subspecialty fellowships to accelerate teaching skills development for future educators.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, GraduateFaculty, MedicalTeachingAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansInternal MedicineNeeds Assessment

Identifiers

PMID30249229
PMCPMC6154890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.