Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30249218›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2018

Hospital utilization rates following antipsychotic dose reductions: implications for tardive dyskinesia.

Stanley N Caroff, Fan Mu, Rajeev Ayyagari, Traci Schilling, Victor Abler, Benjamin Carroll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Recent Advances in the Pharmacology of Tardive Dyskinesia.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Tardive Dyskinesia: Treatment Update.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019
    Review
  9. Overcoming barriers to effective management of tardive dyskinesia.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stanley N CaroffDepartment of Psychiatry, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center and the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 3900 Woodland Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. caroffs@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2840-4763
Fan MuAnalysis Group, 111 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02199, USA.
Rajeev AyyagariAnalysis Group, 111 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02199, USA.
Traci SchillingTeva Pharmaceutical Industries, 41 Moores Rd, Frazer, Malvern, PA, 19355, USA.
Victor AblerTeva Pharmaceutical Industries, 41 Moores Rd, Frazer, Malvern, PA, 19355, USA.
Benjamin CarrollTeva Pharmaceutical Industries, 41 Moores Rd, Frazer, Malvern, PA, 19355, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData are limited on the benefits and risks of dose reduction in managing side effects associated with antipsychotic treatment. As an example, antipsychotic dose reduction has been recommended in the management of tardive dyskinesia (TD), yet the benefits of lowering doses are not well studied. However, stable maintenance treatment is essential to prevent deterioration and relapse in schizophrenia.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the healthcare burden of antipsychotic dose reduction in patients with schizophrenia. Medical claims from six US states spanning a six-year period were analyzed for ≥10% or ≥ 30% antipsychotic dose reductions compared with those from patients receiving a stable dose. Outcomes measured were inpatient admissions and emergency room (ER) visits for schizophrenia, all psychiatric disorders, and all causes, and TD claims.

resultsA total of 19,556 patients were identified with ≥10% dose reduction and 15,239 patients with ≥30% dose reduction. Following a ≥ 10% dose reduction, the risk of an all-cause inpatient admission increased (hazard ratio [HR] 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11, 1.23; P < 0.001), and the risk of an all-cause ER visit increased (HR 1.09; 95% CI 1.05, 1.14; P < 0.001) compared with controls. Patients with a ≥ 10% dose reduction had an increased risk of admission or ER visit for schizophrenia (HR 1.27; 95% CI 1.19, 1.36; P < 0.001) and for all psychiatric disorders (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.10, 1.23; P < 0.001) compared with controls. A dose reduction of ≥30% also led to an increased risk of admission for all causes (HR 1.23; 95% CI 1.17, 1.31; P < 0.001), and for admission or ER visit for schizophrenia (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.21, 1.41; P < 0.001) or for all psychiatric disorders (HR 1.21; 95% CI 1.14, 1.29; P < 0.001) compared with controls. Dose reductions had no significant effect on claims for TD.

conclusionPatients with antipsychotic dose reductions showed significant increases in both all-cause and mental health-related hospitalizations, suggesting that antipsychotic dose reductions may lead to increased overall healthcare burden in some schizophrenia patients. This highlights the need for alternative strategies for the management of side effects, including TD, in schizophrenia patients that allow for maintaining effective antipsychotic treatment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntipsychotic AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFacilities and Services UtilizationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesAntipsychotic AgentsHealthcare burdenRelapseSchizophreniaTardive dyskinesia; antipsychotic medication

Identifiers

PMID30249218
PMCPMC6154822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.