Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30249217›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary and alternative medicine2018

Use of biologically-based complementary medicine in breast and gynecological cancer patients during systemic therapy.

Loisa Drozdoff, Evelyn Klein, Marion Kiechle, Daniela Paepke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Therapeutic Efficacy ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. LC-PDA-MS and GC-MS Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Study of the Mechanism of Antiemetic Effect ofDrug design, development and therapy · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Loisa DrozdoffDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Evelyn KleinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Marion KiechleDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Daniela PaepkeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. Daniela.Paepke@mri.tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4198-7895
TUM Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiologically-based complementary medicines (BB-CAM) including herbs and nutritional supplements are frequently taken by breast- and gynecological cancer patients undergoing systemic therapy. The aim of this study was to analyze the use of these natural CAM methods under systemic therapy.

methodsFrom September 2014 to December 2014 and February 2017 to May 2017 all patients (n= 717) undergoing systemic therapy at the day care unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technical University Munich, Germany, with breast- and/or gynecological cancer were included in this survey. The self-administered 8-item questionnaire was developed to obtain information on complementary medication intake during systemic therapy.

resultsAmong 448 respondents 74.1% reported to use complementary medication simultaneous to their systemic therapy. The most frequently applied methods during therapy were vitamins and minerals supplements (72.3%), medicinal teas (46.7%), phytotherapy (30.1%), and mistletoe (25.3%). The analysis showed that various patients-, disease- and therapy characteristics like receiving chemotherapy (p= 0.002), and younger age (younger than 60 years; p=0.017) are significantly associated with BB-CAM use.

conclusionsOur data suggest that female cancer patients undergoing systemic therapy frequently use BB-CAM medicine. Therefore, it is indispensable to implement counseling and evidence-based complementary treatments into clinical routine of cancer centers. A counseling service for integrative medicine concepts and an outpatient program (ZIGG) was therefore implemented in our cancer center in 2013. Further research on the CAM intake of cancer patients is needed in order to verify drug interactions and implement specific guidelines for integrative medication concepts.

Indexed as

Complementary TherapiesAgedBreast NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesDietary SupplementsFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHumansMateria MedicaMiddle AgedPhytotherapyPlant PreparationsMateria MedicaPlant Preparations

Identifiers

PMID30249217
PMCPMC6154925
OpenAlexW2891954837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.