Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30249205›Full record

SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2018

Comparison of analgesic effect of oxycodone and morphine on patients with moderate and advanced cancer pain: a meta-analysis.

Kai-Kai Guo, Cheng-Qi Deng, Gui-Jun Lu, Guo-Li Zhao

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Oxycodone for cancer-related pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Role of Pharmacogenomics in Opioid Prescribing.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kai-Kai GuoDepartment of Pain Management, The Center of Anaesthetized Operation, Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China.
Cheng-Qi DengDepartment of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of General Hospital of PLA, Beijing, 100048, China.
Gui-Jun LuDepartment of Pain Management, The Center of Anaesthetized Operation, Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China. u0i86i@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2838-4339
Guo-Li ZhaoDepartment of Pain Management, The Center of Anaesthetized Operation, Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMorphine and oxycodone are considered as wide-spreadly used opioids for moderate/severe cancer pain. However, debate exists about the evidence regarding their relative tolerability and underlying results.

methodsA systematic search of online electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library updated on October 2017 were conducted. The meta-analysis was performed including the studies that were designed as randomized controlled trials.

resultsIn total, seven randomized clinical trials met our inclusion criteria. No statistical differences in analgesic effect between oxycodone and morphine were observed. Both the pooled analysis of API (MD =0.01, 95% CI -0.22 - 0.23; p = 0.96) and WPI (MD = - 0.05, 95% CI -0.21 - 0.30; p = 0.72) demonstrated clinical non-inferiority of the efficacy of morphine compared with oxycodone, respectively. Additionally, no significant difference in PRR response was observed in either oxycodone or morphine that were used in patients (MD =0.99, 95% CI -0.88 - 1.11; p = 0.87). With the pooled result of AEs indicating the comparable safety profiles between the 2 treatment groups, the meta-analysis on the nausea (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 0.90-1.59; p = 0.22), vomiting (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 0.75-2.38; p = 0.33), somnolence (OR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.95-1.93; p = 0.10), diarrhea (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.60-1,67; p = 0.98), and constipation (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.77-1.41; p = 0.79) was conducted, respectively.

conclusionsIn the current study, no remarkable difference was identified either in analgesic efficacy or in tolerability of oxycodone and morphine as the first-line therapy for patients with moderate to severe cancer pain. Thus, no sufficient clinical evidence on the superior effects of oxycodone to morphine was provided in this experimental hypothesis.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidCancer PainHumansMorphineOxycodoneRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidMorphineOxycodoneCancer painMeta-analysisMorphineOxycodone

Identifiers

PMID30249205
PMCPMC6154420
OpenAlexW2890926712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.