Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30249197›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2018

Outcomes of STEMI patients with chronic kidney disease treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: the Malaysian National Cardiovascular Disease Database - Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (NCVD-PCI) registry data from 2007 to 2014.

Muhammad Dzafir Ismail, Maisarah Jalalonmuhali, Zaid Azhari, Jeevitha Mariapun, Zhen-Vin Lee, Imran Zainal Abidin, Wan Azman Wan Ahmad, Ahmad Syadi Mahmood Zuhdi, NCVD-PCI investigators

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Muhammad Dzafir IsmailDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University Malaya Medical Centre, 59100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. dzafir@ummc.edu.my.ORCID 0000-0002-7451-1802
Maisarah JalalonmuhaliDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University Malaya Medical Centre, 59100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Zaid AzhariDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University Malaya Medical Centre, 59100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Jeevitha MariapunDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Zhen-Vin LeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University Malaya Medical Centre, 59100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Imran Zainal AbidinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University Malaya Medical Centre, 59100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Wan Azman Wan AhmadDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University Malaya Medical Centre, 59100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ahmad Syadi Mahmood ZuhdiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University Malaya Medical Centre, 59100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
NCVD-PCI investigators
University Malaya Medical Centre · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with renal impairment often left out from most major clinical trials assessing the optimal treatment for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Large body of evidence from various cardiovascular registries reflecting more 'real-world' experience might contribute to the knowledge on how best to treat this special cohort. We aim to analyze the outcomes of Malaysian STEMI patients with renal impairment treated with coronary angioplasty.

methodsUtilizing the Malaysian National Cardiovascular Disease Database-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (NCVD-PCI) registry data from 2007 to 2014, STEMI patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were stratified into presence (GFR < 60 mls/min/1.73m

resultsA total of 6563 patients were included in the final analysis. STEMI CKD cohort was predominantly male (80%) with mean age of 61.02 ± 9.95 years. They had higher cardiovascular risk factors namely diabetes mellitus (54.6%), hypertension (79.2%) and dyslipidemia (68.8%) in contrast to those without CKD. There were notably higher percentage of CKD patients presented with Killip class 3 and 4; 24.9 vs 8.7%. Thrombolytic therapy remained the most commonly instituted treatment regardless the status of kidney function. Furthermore, our STEMI CKD cohort also was more likely to receive less of evidence-based treatment upon discharge. In terms of outcomes, patients with CKD were more likely to develop in-hospital death (OR: 4.55, 95% CI 3.11-6.65), MACE (OR: 3.42, 95% CI 2.39-4.90) and vascular complications (OR: 1.88, 95% CI 0.95-3.7) compared to the non-CKD patients. The risk of death at 1-year post PCI in STEMI CKD patients was also reported to be high (HR: 3.79, 95% CI 2.84-5.07).

conclusionSTEMI and CKD is a deadly combination, proven in our cohort, adding on to the current evidence in the literature. We noted that our STEMI CKD patients tend to be younger than the Caucasian with extremely high prevalence of diabetes mellitus. The poor outcome mainly driven by immediate or short term adverse events peri-procedural, therefore suggesting that more efficient treatment in this special group is imperative.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedCoronary AngiographyDatabases, FactualFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHospital MortalityHumansKidneyMalaysiaMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRegistriesRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30249197
PMCPMC6154951
OpenAlexW2889841757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.