Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30249192›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

A similar effect of P16 hydroxymethylation and true-methylation on the prediction of malignant transformation of oral epithelial dysplasia: observation from a prospective study.

Hongwei Liu, Zhaojun Liu, Xue-Wei Liu, Si Xu, Lei Wang, Yang Liu, Jing Zhou, Liankun Gu, Yan Gao, Xiao-Yong Liu and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02967120 (A Multicentral Prospective Study on Prediction of Malignant Progression of Oral Epithelial Dysplasia With p16 Hydroxymethylation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02967120 unknown statusnot on this map

A Multicentral Prospective Study on Prediction of Malignant Progression of Oral Epithelial Dysplasia With p16 Hydroxymethylation

TypeobservationalSponsorBeijing Municipal Administration of HospitalsRan2014 to 2018Enrolled265ConditionsOral Epithelial DysplasiaArmsno intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Hongwei LiuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing, 100081, China.
Zhaojun LiuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (MOE/Beijing), Division of Aetiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China.
Xue-Wei LiuCapital Medical University School of Stomatology, Beijing, 100050, China.
Si XuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing, 100081, China.
Lei WangCapital Medical University School of Stomatology, Beijing, 100050, China.
Yang LiuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing, 100081, China.
Jing ZhouKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (MOE/Beijing), Division of Aetiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China.
Liankun GuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (MOE/Beijing), Division of Aetiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China.
Yan GaoKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing, 100081, China.
Xiao-Yong LiuCapital Medical University School of Stomatology, Beijing, 100050, China.
Huidong ShiGeorgia Cancer Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
Zheng SunCapital Medical University School of Stomatology, Beijing, 100050, China. sunzheng12@vip.sohu.com.
Dajun DengKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (MOE/Beijing), Division of Aetiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China. dengdajun@bjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5161-5943
Peking University · CNCapital Medical University · CNAugusta University · US

Funding

Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospital Clinical Medical Development of Special Funding Support XM201303Beijing Science and Technology Commission Z151100001615022National Natural Science Foundation of China 81672770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal P16 methylation (P16M), including P16 hydroxymethylation (P16H) and true-P16M, correlates with malignant transformation of oral epithelial dysplasia (OED). Both true-P16M and P16H are early events in carcinogenesis. The aim of this study is to prospectively determine if discrimination of true-P16M from P16H is necessary for prediction of cancer development from OEDs.

methodsPatients (n = 265) with mild or moderate OED were recruited into the double blind two-center cohort. Total-P16M and P16H were analyzed using the 115-bp MethyLight, TET-assisted bisulfite (TAB) methylation-specific PCR (MSP), and TAB-sequencing. Total-P16M-positive and P16H-negative samples were defined as true-P16M-positive. Progression of OEDs was monitored for a minimum 24 months follow-up period.

resultsP16H was detected in 23 of 73 (31.5%) total-P16M-positive OEDs. Follow-up information was obtained from 247 patients with an ultimate compliance rate of 93.2%. OED-derived squamous cell carcinomas were observed in 13.0% (32/247) patients during follow-up (median, 41.0 months). The cancer progression rate for total-P16M-positive patients was significantly increased when compared to total-P16M-negative patients [23.3% vs 8.6%; adjusted odds ratio = 2.67 (95% CI: 1.19-5.99)]. However, the cancer progression rates were similar between P16H- and true-P16M-positive OEDs [26.1% (6/23) vs 22.0% (11/50); odds ratio = 0.80 (95% CI: 0.22-2.92)]. The cancer-free survival was also similar for these patients.

conclusionP16H and true-P16M are similar biomarkers for determining malignant potential of OEDs. Discrimination of P16H from true-P16M, at least in OED, may be not necessary in clinical applications.

trial registrationThis study is registered prospectively in the U.S. National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Protocol Registration System (trial number NCT02967120, available at https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02967120 ).

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAgedAllelesBiomarkers, TumorCell Transformation, NeoplasticCpG IslandsCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Disease ProgressionEpithelial CellsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMouth MucosaMouth NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16HydroxymethylationMalignant transformationOral epithelial dysplasiaP16Prospective cohort

Identifiers

PMID30249192
PMCPMC6154879
OpenAlexW2890632224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.