Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30249176›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

Machine Learning for detection of viral sequences in human metagenomic datasets.

Zurab Bzhalava, Ardi Tampuu, Piotr Bała, Raul Vicente, Joakim Dillner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Agnostic Sequencing for Detection of Viral Pathogens.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. SARS-CoV-2 virus classification based on stacked sparse autoencoder.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Explainable deep neural networks for novel viral genome prediction.Applied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zurab BzhalavaDept. of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, F46, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ardi TampuuInstitute of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Piotr BałaInterdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Raul VicenteInstitute of Computer Science, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Joakim DillnerDept. of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, F46, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden. joakim.dillner@ki.se.

Funding

Estonian Research Competency Council (EE) PUT1476NordForsk 62721Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning RB13-0011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetection of highly divergent or yet unknown viruses from metagenomics sequencing datasets is a major bioinformatics challenge. When human samples are sequenced, a large proportion of assembled contigs are classified as "unknown", as conventional methods find no similarity to known sequences. We wished to explore whether machine learning algorithms using Relative Synonymous Codon Usage frequency (RSCU) could improve the detection of viral sequences in metagenomic sequencing data.

resultsWe trained Random Forest and Artificial Neural Network using metagenomic sequences taxonomically classified into virus and non-virus classes. The algorithms achieved accuracies well beyond chance level, with area under ROC curve 0.79. Two codons (TCG and CGC) were found to have a particularly strong discriminative capacity.

conclusionRSCU-based machine learning techniques applied to metagenomic sequencing data can help identify a large number of putative viral sequences and provide an addition to conventional methods for taxonomic classification.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticMachine LearningMetagenomicsAlgorithmsBase SequenceComputational BiologyHumansNeural Networks, ComputerROC CurveSequence Analysis, DNAVirusesHuman samplesMachine learningMetagenomic sequencingViral genomes

Identifiers

PMID30249176
PMCPMC6154907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.