ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2018
Data-Driven Exploration of Selectivity and Off-Target Activities of Designated Chemical Probes.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Target-specific compound selectivity for multi-target drug discovery and repurposing.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Relevance of physicochemical properties and functional pharmacology data to predict the clinical safety profile of direct oral anticoagulants.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2020Article
- Data structures for computational compound promiscuity analysis and exemplary applications to inhibitors of the human kinome.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2020Article
- Systematic computational identification of promiscuity cliff pathways formed by inhibitors of the human kinome.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemical probes are of central relevance for chemical biology. To unambiguously explore the role of target proteins in triggering or mediating biological functions, small molecules used as probes should ideally be target-specific; at least, they should have sufficiently high selectivity for a primary target. We present a thorough analysis of currently available activity data for designated chemical probes to address several key questions: How well defined are chemical probes? What is their level of selectivity? Is there evidence for additional activities? Are some probes "better" than others? Therefore, highly curated chemical probes were collected and their selectivity was analyzed on the basis of publicly available compound activity data. Different selectivity patterns were observed, which distinguished designated high-quality probes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.