Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30248963›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Development of Policy Relevant Human Biomonitoring Indicators for Chemical Exposure in the European Population.

Jurgen Buekers, Madlen David, Gudrun Koppen, Jos Bessems, Martin Scheringer, Erik Lebret, Denis Sarigiannis, Marike Kolossa-Gehring, Marika Berglund, Greet Schoeters and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 8 countries.

Jurgen BuekersFlemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO)-Sustainable Health, 2400 Mol, Belgium. jurgen.buekers@vito.be.
Madlen DavidGerman Environment Agency (UBA), 14195 Berlin, Germany. Madlen.David@uba.de.
Gudrun KoppenFlemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO)-Sustainable Health, 2400 Mol, Belgium. gudrun.koppen@vito.be.
Jos BessemsFlemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO)-Sustainable Health, 2400 Mol, Belgium. jos.bessems@vito.be.
Martin ScheringerDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH), 8092 Zürich, Switzerland. scheringer@chem.ethz.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-0809-7826
Erik LebretInstitute of Risk Assessment Sciences (IRAS), Utrecht University, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands. erik.lebret@rivm.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-2602-2155
Denis SarigiannisDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece. d.a.sarigiannis@gmail.com.
Marike Kolossa-GehringGerman Environment Agency (UBA), 14195 Berlin, Germany. marike.kolossa@uba.de.
Marika BerglundInstitute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Karolinska Institutet (KI), 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden. marika.berglund@ki.se.
Greet SchoetersFlemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO)-Sustainable Health, 2400 Mol, Belgium. greet.schoeters@vito.be.
Xenia TrierEuropean Environment Agency (EEA), 1050 Copenhagen, Denmark. Xenia.Trier@eea.europa.eu.ORCID 0000-0001-6067-8321
Flemish Institute for Technological Research · BEGerman Environment Agency · DEAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GREuropean Environment Agency · DKKarolinska Institutet · SEMasaryk University · CZUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Union's 7th Environmental Action Programme (EAP) aims to assess and minimize environmental health risks from the use of hazardous chemicals by 2020. From this angle, policy questions like whether an implemented policy to reduce chemical exposure has had an effect over time, whether the health of people in specific regions or subpopulations is at risk, or whether the body burden of chemical substances (the internal exposure) varies with, for example, time, country, sex, age, or socio-economic status, need to be answered. Indicators can help to synthesize complex scientific information into a few key descriptors with the purpose of providing an answer to a non-expert audience. Human biomonitoring (HBM) indicators at the European Union (EU) level are unfortunately lacking. Within the Horizon2020 European Human Biomonitoring project HBM4EU, an approach to develop European HBM indicators was worked out. To learn from and ensure interoperability with other European indicators, 15 experts from the HBM4EU project (German Umweltbundesamt (UBA), Flemish research institute VITO, University of Antwerp, European Environment Agency (EEA)), and the World Health Organization (WHO), European Core Health Indicator initiative (ECHI), Eurostat, Swiss ETH Zurich and the Czech environmental institute CENIA, and contributed to a workshop, held in June 2017 at the EEA in Copenhagen. First, selection criteria were defined to evaluate when and if results of internal chemical exposure measured by HBM, need to be translated into a European HBM-based indicator. Two main aspects are the HBM indicator's relevance for policy, society, health, and the quality of the biomarker data (availability, comparability, ease of interpretation). Secondly, an approach for the calculation of the indicators was designed. Two types of indicators were proposed: 'sum indicators of internal exposure' derived directly from HBM biomarker concentrations and 'indicators for health risk', comparing HBM concentrations to HBM health-based guidance values (HBM HBGVs). In the latter case, both the percentage of the studied population exceeding the HBM HBGVs (PE) and the extent of exceedance (EE), calculated as the population's exposure level divided by the HBM HBGV, can be calculated. These indicators were applied to two examples of hazardous chemicals: bisphenol A (BPA) and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), which both have high policy and societal relevance and for which high quality published data were available (DEMOCOPHES, Swedish monitoring campaign). European HBM indicators help to summarize internal exposure to chemical substances among the European population and communicate to what degree environmental policies are successful in keeping internal exposures sufficiently low. The main aim of HBM indicators is to allow follow-up of chemical safety in Europe.

Indexed as

Environmental PolicyHealth PolicyAdolescentAdultChildEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringEuropeEuropean UnionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultgroups of substancesHBMHBM4EUhealth-based guidance valuehuman biomonitoringindicatorscience-policy translation

Identifiers

PMID30248963
PMCPMC6209865
OpenAlexW2890718782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.