Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30248184›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2018

Opportunities and challenges to utilization of quantitative imaging: Report of the AAPM practical big data workshop.

Thomas R Mackie, Edward F Jackson, Maryellen Giger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An efficient magnetic resonance image data quality screening dashboard.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas R MackieDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Edward F JacksonDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Maryellen GigerDepartment of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.

Funding

Quantitative Image Analysis for Assessing Response to Breast Cancer TherapyU01CA195564 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GIGER, MARYELLEN L. · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA195564NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201500021CNIBIB NIH HHS HHSN268201000050CNIBIB NIH HHS HHSN268201300071CNIBIB NIH HHS HHSN268201500021C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis article is a summary of the quantitative imaging subgroup of the 2017 AAPM Practical Big Data Workshop (PBDW-2017) on progress and challenges in big data applied to cancer treatment and research supplemented by a draft white paper following an American Association of Physicists in Medicine FOREM meeting on Imaging Genomics in 2014.

aimsThe goal of PBDW-2017 was to close the gap between theoretical vision and practical experience with encountering and solving challenges in curating and analyzing data.

conclusionsRecommendations based on the meetings are summarized.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualMedical InformaticsPhysicsResearch ReportDiagnostic ImagingHumansNeoplasmsSocieties, MedicalWorkflowbig datadeep learningimaging biomarkersquantitative imagingradiomics

Identifiers

PMID30248184
PMCPMC9559989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.