Observational studyPloS one2018
Short-term effectiveness of HIV care coordination among persons with recent HIV diagnosis or history of poor HIV outcomes.
Observational study in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03628287 (Program Refinements to Optimize Model Impact and Scalability Based on Evidence), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Program Refinements to Optimize Model Impact and Scalability Based on Evidence
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of an HIV Care Coordination Program on All-cause, HIV-related, and Non-HIV-related Mortality in Younger and Older Adults With HIV in New York City, 2018-2022.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Impact of a Revised Ryan White Part A HIV Care Coordination Program on Viral Suppression and Durable Viral Suppression.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2026Article
- "We're Going to Be Here": Providers' Perspectives on Implementing a Revised HIV Care Coordination Program.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2025Article
- Article
- Heterogeneity of provider preferences for HIV Care Coordination Program features: latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment.HIV research & clinical practice · 2024Article
- Patient Education and Decision Support for Long-Acting Injectable HIV Antiretroviral Therapy: Protocol for Tool Development and Pilot Testing with Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Medical Case Management Programs in New York.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Client preferences for HIV Care Coordination Program features in New York City: latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2023Article
- Article
- Examining the Role of Autonomy Support, Goal Setting, and Care Coordination Quality on HIV PrEP Adherence in Black Men Who Have Sex with Men: HPTN 073.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2023Article
- Provider preferences for delivery of HIV care coordination services: results from a discrete choice experiment.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2022Article
- HIV Care Coordination promotes care re-engagement and viral suppression among people who have been out of HIV medical care: an observational effectiveness study using a surveillance-based contemporaneous comparison group.AIDS research and therapy · 2021Observational
- Article
- Impact of an HIV Care Coordination Program on the Timeliness of Viral Suppression and Immune Recovery Among Clients Newly Diagnosed with HIV.AIDS and behavior · 2020Article
- Public Health Practice-Driven Research to Improve HIV Prevention in the United States.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2019Article
- Impact of an HIV Care Coordination Program on Durable Viral Suppression.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The New York City HIV Care Coordination Program (CCP) combines multiple evidence-based strategies to support persons living with HIV (PLWH) at risk for, or with a recent history of, poor HIV outcomes. We assessed the comparative effectiveness of the CCP by merging programmatic data on CCP clients with population-based surveillance data on all New York City PLWH. A non-CCP comparison group of similar PLWH who met CCP eligibility criteria was identified using surveillance data. The CCP and non-CCP groups were matched on propensity for CCP enrollment within four baseline treatment status groups (newly diagnosed or previously diagnosed and either consistently unsuppressed, inconsistently suppressed or consistently suppressed). We compared CCP to non-CCP proportions with viral load suppression at 12-month follow-up. Among the 13,624 persons included, 15∙3% were newly diagnosed; among the 84∙7% previously diagnosed, 14∙2% were consistently suppressed, 28∙9% were inconsistently suppressed, and 41∙6% were consistently unsuppressed in the year prior to baseline. At 12-month follow-up, 59∙9% of CCP and 53∙9% of non-CCP participants had viral load suppression (Relative Risk = 1.11, 95%CI:1.08-1.14). Among those newly diagnosed and those consistently unsuppressed at baseline, the relative risk of viral load suppression in the CCP versus non-CCP participants was 1.15 (95%CI:1.09-1.23) and 1.32 (95%CI:1.23-1.42), respectively. CCP exposure shows benefits over no CCP exposure for persons newly diagnosed or consistently unsuppressed, but not for persons suppressed in the year prior to baseline. We recommend more targeted case finding for CCP enrollment and increased attention to viral load suppression maintenance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.