Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30247579›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2018

Effect of fluconazole prophylaxis on Candida fluconazole susceptibility in premature infants.

Julie Autmizguine, P Brian Smith, Kristi Prather, Catherine Bendel, Girija Natarajan, Margarita Bidegain, David A Kaufman, David J Burchfield, Ashley S Ross, Paresh Pandit and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Breakpoints for the Classification of Anti-BioMed research international · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults and children.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Guideline
  4. Bacterial and fungal infections in infants born before 24 weeks' gestation: a review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Recent research on pharmacological prevention strategies for invasive fungal infection in preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antibiotic-induced depletion ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Julie AutmizguineDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
P Brian SmithDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Kristi PratherDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Catherine BendelUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Girija NatarajanWayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Margarita BidegainDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
David A KaufmanUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
David J BurchfieldUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Ashley S RossUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Paresh PanditChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia at Vitua West Jersey Hospital Voorhees, Voorhees, NJ, USA.
Wiley A SchellDepartment of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Jamie GaoDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Daniel K BenjaminDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Fluconazole Prophylaxis Study Team
Montreat College · USDuke University · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Florida · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CAUniversity of Virginia · USWayne State University · US

Funding

Prevention of Invasive Candidiasis: PK, Safety, and Neurodevelopmental OutcomesR01HD057956 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BENJAMIN, DANIEL K. · 2008 to 2012
$2.8M
Prevention of Invasive Candidiasis: PK, Safety, and Neurodevelopmental OutcomesR01FD003519 · FDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BENJAMIN, DANIEL K. · 2008 to 2011
$1.6M
FDA HHS R01 FD003519NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD057956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Extremely premature infants are at high risk of developing invasive candidiasis; fluconazole prophylaxis is safe and effective for reducing invasive candidiasis in this population but further study is needed. We sought to better understand the effect of prophylactic fluconazole on a selection of fluconazole-resistant Candida species. Methods: We evaluated the susceptibility to fluconazole of Candida isolates from premature infants (<750 g birth weight) enrolled in a multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of fluconazole prophylaxis. Candida species were isolated through surveillance cultures at baseline (study day 0-7), period 1 (study day 8-28) and period 2 (study day 29-49). Fluconazole MICs were determined for all Candida isolates. Results: Three hundred and sixty-one infants received fluconazole (n = 188) or placebo (n = 173). After the baseline period, Candida colonization was significantly lower in the fluconazole group compared with placebo during periods 1 (5% versus 27%; P < 0.001) and 2 (3% versus 27%; P < 0.001). After the baseline period, two infants (1%) were colonized with at least one fluconazole-resistant Candida in each group. Median fluconazole MIC was similar in both treatment groups at baseline and period 1. However, in period 2, median MIC was higher in the fluconazole group compared with placebo (1.00 versus 0.50 mg/L, P = 0.01). There was no emergence of resistance observed and no patients developed invasive candidiasis with a resistant Candida isolate. Conclusions: Fluconazole prophylaxis decreased Candida albicans and 'non-albicans' Candida colonization and was associated with a slightly higher fluconazole MIC for colonizing Candida isolates.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, FungalInfant, PrematureAntifungal AgentsCandidaCandidiasis, InvasiveChemopreventionFemaleFluconazoleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPlacebosTreatment OutcomeAntifungal AgentsFluconazolePlacebos

Identifiers

PMID30247579
PMCPMC6927883
OpenAlexW2891350451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.