Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30247544›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2018

Conserved Genes Underlie Phenotypic Plasticity in an Incipiently Social Bee.

Sandra M Rehan, Karl M Glastad, Michael A Steffen, Cameron R Fay, Brendan G Hunt, Amy L Toth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Evolution of Bees: Insights from 'Omic Studies.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Putting hornets on the genomic map.Scientific reports · 2023
    Article
  9. Molecular patterns and processes in evolving sociality: lessons from insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Developmental plasticity shapes social traits and selection in a facultatively eusocial bee.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra M RehanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New Hampshire.
Karl M GlastadDepartment of Cell & Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania.
Michael A SteffenDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New Hampshire.
Cameron R FayDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University.
Brendan G HuntDepartment of Entomology, University of Georgia.
Amy L TothDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University.
Iowa State University · USUniversity of New Hampshire · USUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a strong history of theoretical work on the mechanisms of social evolution, relatively little is known of the molecular genetic changes that accompany transitions from solitary to eusocial forms. Here, we provide the first genome of an incipiently social bee that shows both solitary and social colony organization in sympatry, the Australian carpenter bee Ceratina australensis. Through comparative analysis, we provide support for the role of conserved genes and cis-regulation of gene expression in the phenotypic plasticity observed in nest-sharing, a rudimentary form of sociality. Additionally, we find that these conserved genes are associated with caste differences in advanced eusocial species, suggesting these types of mechanisms could pave the molecular pathway from solitary to eusocial living. Genes associated with social nesting in this species show signatures of being deeply conserved, in contrast to previous studies in other bees showing novel and faster-evolving genes are associated with derived sociality. Our data provide support for the idea that the earliest social transitions are driven by changes in gene regulation of deeply conserved genes.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionSocial BehaviorAdaptation, BiologicalAnimalsBase SequenceBeesBrainConserved SequenceFemaleGene ExpressionGenome, InsectTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID30247544
PMCPMC6190964
OpenAlexW2892798514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.