Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30247525›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2019

Population structure of Miscanthus sacchariflorus reveals two major polyploidization events, tetraploid-mediated unidirectional introgression from diploid M. sinensis, and diversity centred around the Yellow Sea.

Lindsay V Clark, Xiaoli Jin, Karen Koefoed Petersen, Kossanou G Anzoua, Larissa Bagmet, Pavel Chebukin, Martin Deuter, Elena Dzyubenko, Nicolay Dzyubenko, Kweon Heo and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A sorghum-anchored pan-grass syntenic gene set in grasses.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  4. Cold Stress Responses of Different Genotypes ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Lindsay V ClarkDepartment of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Xiaoli JinAgronomy Department, Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm Research of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Karen Koefoed PetersenDepartment of Food Science, Aarhus University, Årslev, Denmark.
Kossanou G AnzouaField Science Center for Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Larissa BagmetVavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources, Russia.
Pavel ChebukinVavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources, Russia.
Martin DeuterTINPLANT Biotechnik und Pflanzenvermehrung GmbH, Klein Wanzleben, Germany.
Elena DzyubenkoVavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources, Russia.
Nicolay DzyubenkoVavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources, Russia.
Kweon HeoKangwon National University, Chuncheon, Gangwon, South Korea.
Douglas A JohnsonUSDA-ARS Forage and Range Research Lab, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.
Uffe JørgensenDepartment of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Jens Bonderup KjeldsenDepartment of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Hironori NaganoField Science Center for Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Junhua PengLife Science and Technology Center, China National Seed Group Co. Ltd, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Andrey SabitovVavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources, Russia.
Toshihiko YamadaField Science Center for Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Ji Hye YooKangwon National University, Chuncheon, Gangwon, South Korea.
Chang Yeon YuKangwon National University, Chuncheon, Gangwon, South Korea.
Stephen P LongDepartment of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Erik J SacksDepartment of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
N.I. Vavilov Research Institute of Plant Industry · RUAarhus University · DKHokkaido University · JPKangwon National University · KRUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUtah State University · USZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsMiscanthus, a C4 perennial grass native to East Asia, is a promising biomass crop. Miscanthus sacchariflorus has a broad geographic range, is used to produce paper in China and is one of the parents (along with Miscanthus sinensis) of the important biomass species Miscanthus × giganteus. The largest study of M. sacchariflorus population genetics to date is reported here.

methodsCollections included 764 individuals across East Asia. Samples were genotyped with 34 605 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) derived from restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) and ten plastid microsatellites, and were subjected to ploidy analysis by flow cytometry. KEY

resultsSix major genetic groups within M. sacchariflorus were identified using SNP data: three diploid groups, comprising Yangtze (M. sacchariflorus ssp. lutarioriparius), N China and Korea/NE China/Russia; and three tetraploid groups, comprising N China/Korea/Russia, S Japan and N Japan. Miscanthus sacchariflorus ssp. lutarioriparius was derived from the N China group, with a substantial bottleneck. Japanese and mainland tetraploids originated from independent polyploidization events. Hybrids between diploid M. sacchariflorus and M. sinensis were identified in Korea, but without introgression into either parent species. In contrast, tetraploid M. sacchariflorus in southern Japan and Korea exhibited substantial hybridization and introgression with local diploid M. sinensis.

conclusionsGenetic data indicated that the land now under the Yellow Sea was a centre of diversity for M. sacchariflorus during the last glacial maximum, followed by a series of migrations as the climate became warmer and wetter. Overall, M. sacchariflorus has greater genetic diversity than M. sinensis, suggesting that breeding and selection within M. sacchariflorus will be important for the development of improved M. × giganteus. Ornamental M. sacchariflorus genotypes in Europe and North America represent a very narrow portion of the species' genetic diversity, and thus do not well represent the species as a whole.

Indexed as

DiploidyTetraploidyAsia, EasternChinaEuropeHumansJapanNorth AmericaPoaceaebioenergyhybridizationlutarioripariusMiscanthus × giganteusMiscanthus sacchariflorusMiscanthus sacchariflorus sspMiscanthus sinensisplastid haplotypepolyploidypopulation geneticsrestriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq)

Identifiers

PMID30247525
PMCPMC6821896
OpenAlexW2892251592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.