Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30247488›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2018

A universal SNP and small-indel variant caller using deep neural networks.

Ryan Poplin, Pi-Chuan Chang, David Alexander, Scott Schwartz, Thomas Colthurst, Alexander Ku, Dan Newburger, Jojo Dijamco, Nam Nguyen, Pegah T Afshar and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,021 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,021citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,021 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

961 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ryan PoplinVerily Life Sciences, Mountain View, California, USA.
Pi-Chuan ChangGoogle Inc., Mountain View, California, USA.
David AlexanderGoogle Inc., Mountain View, California, USA.
Scott SchwartzGoogle Inc., Mountain View, California, USA.
Thomas ColthurstGoogle Inc., Mountain View, California, USA.
Alexander KuGoogle Inc., Mountain View, California, USA.
Dan NewburgerVerily Life Sciences, Mountain View, California, USA.
Jojo DijamcoVerily Life Sciences, Mountain View, California, USA.
Nam NguyenVerily Life Sciences, Mountain View, California, USA.
Pegah T AfsharVerily Life Sciences, Mountain View, California, USA.
Sam S GrossVerily Life Sciences, Mountain View, California, USA.
Lizzie DorfmanVerily Life Sciences, Mountain View, California, USA.
Cory Y McLeanVerily Life Sciences, Mountain View, California, USA.
Mark A DePristoVerily Life Sciences, Mountain View, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite rapid advances in sequencing technologies, accurately calling genetic variants present in an individual genome from billions of short, errorful sequence reads remains challenging. Here we show that a deep convolutional neural network can call genetic variation in aligned next-generation sequencing read data by learning statistical relationships between images of read pileups around putative variant and true genotype calls. The approach, called DeepVariant, outperforms existing state-of-the-art tools. The learned model generalizes across genome builds and mammalian species, allowing nonhuman sequencing projects to benefit from the wealth of human ground-truth data. We further show that DeepVariant can learn to call variants in a variety of sequencing technologies and experimental designs, including deep whole genomes from 10X Genomics and Ion Ampliseq exomes, highlighting the benefits of using more automated and generalizable techniques for variant calling.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanNeural Networks, ComputerPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsDNA Mutational AnalysisGenomicsGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansINDEL MutationMammalsSequence Analysis, DNASoftware

Identifiers

PMID30247488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.