Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30247477›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2018

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents.

Mojtaba Kermani, Zahra Fatahi, Dechuan Sun, Abbas Haghparast, Chris French

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mojtaba KermaniDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, The University of Melbourne; Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne; m.kermani@unimelb.edu.au.
Zahra FatahiNeuroscience Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science.
Dechuan SunDepartment of Medicine, The University of Melbourne.
Abbas HaghparastNeuroscience Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science.
Chris FrenchDepartment of Medicine, The University of Melbourne; Royal Melbourne Hospital.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reinforcement-guided decision making is the ability to choose between competing courses of action based on the relative value of the benefits and their consequences. This process is integral to the normal human behavior and has been shown to be disrupted by neurological and psychiatric disorders such as addiction, schizophrenia, and depression. Rodents have long been used to uncover the neurobiology of human cognition. To this end, several behavioral tasks have been developed; however, most are non-automated and are labor-intensive. The recent development of the open-source microcontroller has enabled researchers to automate operant-based tasks for assessing a variety of cognitive tasks, standardizing the stimulus presentation, improving the data recording and consequently, improving the research output. Here, we describe an automated delay-based reinforcement-guided decision-making task, using an operant T-maze controlled by custom-written software programs. Using these decision-making tasks, we show the changes in the local field potential activities in the anterior cingulate cortex of a rat whilst it performs a delay-based cost-and-benefit decision-making task.

Indexed as

Conditioning, OperantDecision MakingReinforcement, PsychologyAnimalsCognitionCost-Benefit AnalysisGyrus CinguliMaleRats

Identifiers

PMID30247477
PMCPMC6235116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.