Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30247267›Full record

ArticlePain2019

Morphological and functional properties distinguish the substance P and gastrin-releasing peptide subsets of excitatory interneuron in the spinal cord dorsal horn.

Allen C Dickie, Andrew M Bell, Noboru Iwagaki, Erika Polgár, Maria Gutierrez-Mecinas, Rosalind Kelly, Heather Lyon, Kirsten Turnbull, Steven J West, Alexander Etlin and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Spinal neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor-expressing neurons are a pharmacotherapeutic target for the alleviation of neuropathic pain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. A neuropeptide code for itch.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Allen C DickieSpinal Cord Group, Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Andrew M BellSpinal Cord Group, Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Noboru IwagakiSpinal Cord Group, Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Erika PolgárSpinal Cord Group, Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Maria Gutierrez-MecinasSpinal Cord Group, Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Rosalind KellySpinal Cord Group, Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Heather LyonSpinal Cord Group, Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Kirsten TurnbullSpinal Cord Group, Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Steven J WestThe Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alexander EtlinDepartment of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Joao BrazDepartment of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Masahiko WatanabeDepartment of Anatomy, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
David L H BennettThe Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Allan I BasbaumDepartment of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
John S RiddellSpinal Cord Group, Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Andrew J ToddSpinal Cord Group, Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
University of Glasgow · GBUniversity of California, San Francisco · USJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBHokkaido University · JP

Funding

From the spinal cord to the brain: Neurology of the pain and itch neuronsR35NS097306 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BASBAUM, ALLAN I. · 2017 to 2024
$7.2M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N006119/1Medical Research Council MR/N003403/1NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS097306Wellcome Trust 102645Wellcome Trust 202747/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excitatory interneurons account for the majority of neurons in the superficial dorsal horn, but despite their presumed contribution to pain and itch, there is still limited information about their organisation and function. We recently identified 2 populations of excitatory interneuron defined by expression of gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) or substance P (SP). Here, we demonstrate that these cells show major differences in their morphological, electrophysiological, and pharmacological properties. Based on their somatodendritic morphology and firing patterns, we propose that the SP cells correspond to radial cells, which generally show delayed firing. By contrast, most GRP cells show transient or single-spike firing, and many are likely to correspond to the so-called transient central cells. Unlike the SP cells, few of the GRP cells had long propriospinal projections, suggesting that they are involved primarily in local processing. The 2 populations also differed in responses to neuromodulators, with most SP cells, but few GRP cells, responding to noradrenaline and 5-HT; the converse was true for responses to the μ-opioid agonist DAMGO. Although a recent study suggested that GRP cells are innervated by nociceptors and are strongly activated by noxious stimuli, we found that very few GRP cells receive direct synaptic input from TRPV1-expressing afferents, and that they seldom phosphorylate extracellular signal-regulated kinases in response to noxious stimuli. These findings indicate that the SP and GRP cells differentially process somatosensory information.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnalgesicsAnimalsCapsaicinCholera ToxinExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesGastrin-Releasing PeptideInterneuronsIn Vitro TechniquesLuminescent ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicNeurotransmitter AgentsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPhysical StimulationAnalgesicsCapsaicinCholera ToxinExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesGastrin-Releasing PeptideLuminescent ProteinsNeurotransmitter AgentspreprotachykininProtein PrecursorsRNA, MessengerSensory System AgentsSubstance PTachykinins

Identifiers

PMID30247267
PMCPMC6330098
OpenAlexW2895459316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.