Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30247244›Full record

Observational studyCritical care medicine2018

Combining National Early Warning Score With Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) Improves Risk Prediction in Acute Medical Patients: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.

Line J H Rasmussen, Steen Ladelund, Thomas H Haupt, Gertrude E Ellekilde, Jesper Eugen-Olsen, Ove Andersen

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Line J H RasmussenClinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Steen LadelundClinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Thomas H HauptClinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Gertrude E EllekildeThe Acute Medical Unit, The Emergency Department, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Jesper Eugen-OlsenClinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Ove AndersenClinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Hvidovre Hospital · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSoluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor is a prognostic biomarker associated with critical illness, disease progression, and risk of mortality. We aimed to evaluate whether soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor adds prognostic value to a vital sign-based score for clinical monitoring of patient risk (National Early Warning Score) in acute medical patients.

designRegistry-based observational cohort study of consecutively admitted acute medical patients.

settingThe Acute Medical Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark. PATIENTS: Acute medical patients admitted between November 18, 2013, and September 30, 2015.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsOf 17,312 included patients, admission National Early Warning Score was available for 16,244 (93.8%). During follow-up, 587 patients (3.4%) died in-hospital, 859 (5.0%) within 30 days, and 1,367 (7.9%) within 90 days. High soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor was significantly associated with in-hospital-, 30-day-, and 90-day mortality within all National Early Warning Score groups, in particular in patients with a low National Early Warning Score; for 30-day mortality, mortality rate ratios ranged from 3.45 (95% CI, 2.91-4.10) for patients with National Early Warning Score 0-1, to 1.86 (95% CI, 1.47-2.34) for patients with National Early Warning Score greater than or equal to 9 for every doubling in soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (log2-transformed). Combining National Early Warning Score, age, and sex with soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor improved prediction of in-hospital-, 30-day-, and 90-day mortality, increasing the area under the curve (95% CI) for 30-day mortality from 0.86 (0.85-0.87) to 0.90 (0.89-0.91), p value of less than 0.0001, with a negative predictive value of 99.0%.

conclusionsThe addition of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor to National Early Warning Score significantly improved risk prediction of both low- and high-risk acute medical patients. Patients with low National Early Warning Score but elevated soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor had mortality risks comparable to that of patients with higher National Early Warning Score.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAdultAgedAge FactorsBiomarkersCritical IllnessDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisReceptors, Urokinase Plasminogen ActivatorRisk AssessmentSex FactorsVital SignsBiomarkersReceptors, Urokinase Plasminogen Activator

Identifiers

PMID30247244
PMCPMC6250248
OpenAlexW2894812242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.