ArticleEpidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)2019
Testing Differential Associations Between Smoking and Chronic Disease Across Socioeconomic Groups: Pooled Data From 15 Prospective Studies.
Article in Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined impact of smoking, alcohol and social inequalities on premature mortality in urban India.Nature health · 2026Article
- Residential segregation, housing cost, and smoking behaviors in Black Americans.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2025Article
- Roles of allostatic load, lifestyle and clinical risk factors in mediating the association between education and coronary heart disease risk in Europe.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2021Article
- Biomarker-assessed passive smoking in relation to cause-specific mortality: pooled data from 12 prospective cohort studies comprising 36 584 individuals.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2021Article
- Social inequalities in tobacco-attributable mortality in Spain. The intersection between age, sex and educational level.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFor the same quantity of cigarettes smoked, relative to more affluent people, socioeconomically disadvantaged people have higher levels of smoking biomarkers. This may be ascribed to inhaling cigarette smoke more deeply and more frequently and/or choosing higher tar-containing brands. We investigated whether this increased tobacco load, as captured using cotinine measurements, is associated with a greater risk of mortality in lower social groups.
methodsWe used Cox proportional hazards models stratified by socioeconomic position to calculate hazard ratios in a pooled sample of 15 English and Scottish prospective cohort studies (N = 81,476).
resultsDuring a mean (SD) follow-up of 10.3 (4.4) years, 8234 deaths occurred. Risk of total mortality (hazard ratio; 95% confidence interval) for smokers relative to never-smokers in the high (2.5; 2.1, 3.1), intermediate (2.1; 1.8, 2.4), and low (2.0; 1.9, 2.2) educational groups did not differ markedly (P for interaction=0.61). Similar findings emerged when using cause-specific outcomes and occupational social class and housing tenure as socioeconomic indices.
conclusionContrary to our hypothesis, we found no indication that chronic disease mortality associated with smoking was higher in disadvantaged people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.