Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30246863›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2018

Procedural Framework to Facilitate Hospital-Based Informed Consent for Dementia Research.

Timothy R Holden, Sarah Keller, Alice Kim, Michael Gehring, Emily Schmitz, Carol Hermann, Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi, Amy J H Kind

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Recruiting People With Dementia in Emergency Research: Insights From Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research 2.0 Network (GEAR 2.0) Pilot Studies.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Timothy R HoldenGeriatrics Division, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Sarah KellerGeriatrics Division, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Alice KimGeriatrics Division, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Michael GehringGeriatrics Division, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Emily SchmitzGeriatrics Division, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Carol HermannGeriatrics Division, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Andrea Gilmore-BykovskyiGeriatrics Division, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Amy J H KindGeriatrics Division, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.

Funding

Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP50AG033514 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHAPPELL, RICHARD J · 2009 to 2018
$16.2M
NIA NIH HHS P50 AG033514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving quality and delivery of care for people with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD) requires a comprehensive research agenda that encompasses the entire care continuum. Logistical and ethical challenges of informed consent for research participation of persons with ADRD include determination of capacity to consent, surrogate consent when capacity to consent is compromised, timely identification of the legally authorized representative (LAR) providing surrogate consent, and balancing residual autonomy with surrogate consent. Short stays; limited access to patients, caregivers, and LARs; and fluctuating influences of acute illness on capacity determination compound these challenges in the acute care setting. To address these challenges, we worked with the University of Wisconsin Health Sciences Institutional Review Board to develop a procedural framework for obtaining informed consent from hospitalized individuals with ADRD and their caregivers to participate in a minimal risk care intervention. The framework is specially designed for minimal risk situations in which rapid enrollment is a necessity and uses rapid identification of surrogates to consent for patients who lack legal capacity to make medical decisions, indicated by an activated healthcare power of attorney, and individualized formal assent procedures for patients who lack capacity to consent. These methods were proven effective in facilitating hospital-based recruitment in an ongoing randomized controlled trial and provide a basis for increasing access to acute care clinical research for persons with ADRD. Bolstering research participation through more easily used consent procedures during acute illness is critical to fostering improvements in the delivery of high-quality care to persons with ADRD. J Am Geriatr Soc 66:2243-2248, 2018.

Indexed as

DementiaHealth Services ResearchHospitalsCaregiversDecision MakingHumansInformed ConsentInpatientsLegal GuardiansAlzheimer's diseasedementiaethicsinformed consentresearch

Identifiers

PMID30246863
PMCPMC6289792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.