ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2018
Procedural Framework to Facilitate Hospital-Based Informed Consent for Dementia Research.
Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recruiting and Retaining Dyads of Hospitalized Persons with Dementia and Family Caregivers.Western journal of nursing research · 2022Trial
- Recruiting People With Dementia in Emergency Research: Insights From Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research 2.0 Network (GEAR 2.0) Pilot Studies.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
- Modeling Alzheimer's disease with brain organoids: mechanisms, applications, and future directions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Real-time location system implementation in dementia care: Stakeholder perspectives.The Gerontologist · 2025Article
- Challenges and facilitators of implementing a participatory nutrition project in residential aged care.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2025Article
- Is shorter always better? The pros and cons of treating Gram-negative bloodstream infections with 7 days of antibiotics.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2022Article
- Feasibility of a human factors work-system designed recruitment method for hospitalized persons with dementia.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021Article
- Dementia Caregivers' Experiences Engaging Supportive Services While Residing in Under-Resourced Areas.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2021Article
- Determining medical decision-making capacity in brain tumor patients: why and how?Neuro-oncology practice · 2020Review
- Recruitment and retention of underrepresented populations in Alzheimer's disease research: A systematic review.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2019Review
- Ethical and Methodological Considerations for Evaluating Participant Views on Alzheimer's and Dementia Research.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHREArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Improving quality and delivery of care for people with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD) requires a comprehensive research agenda that encompasses the entire care continuum. Logistical and ethical challenges of informed consent for research participation of persons with ADRD include determination of capacity to consent, surrogate consent when capacity to consent is compromised, timely identification of the legally authorized representative (LAR) providing surrogate consent, and balancing residual autonomy with surrogate consent. Short stays; limited access to patients, caregivers, and LARs; and fluctuating influences of acute illness on capacity determination compound these challenges in the acute care setting. To address these challenges, we worked with the University of Wisconsin Health Sciences Institutional Review Board to develop a procedural framework for obtaining informed consent from hospitalized individuals with ADRD and their caregivers to participate in a minimal risk care intervention. The framework is specially designed for minimal risk situations in which rapid enrollment is a necessity and uses rapid identification of surrogates to consent for patients who lack legal capacity to make medical decisions, indicated by an activated healthcare power of attorney, and individualized formal assent procedures for patients who lack capacity to consent. These methods were proven effective in facilitating hospital-based recruitment in an ongoing randomized controlled trial and provide a basis for increasing access to acute care clinical research for persons with ADRD. Bolstering research participation through more easily used consent procedures during acute illness is critical to fostering improvements in the delivery of high-quality care to persons with ADRD. J Am Geriatr Soc 66:2243-2248, 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.