Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30246799›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2018

Caffeine and Placebo Improved Maximal Exercise Performance Despite Unchanged Motor Cortex Activation and Greater Prefrontal Cortex Deoxygenation.

Flavio O Pires, Carlos A S Dos Anjos, Roberto J M Covolan, Eduardo B Fontes, Timothy D Noakes, Alan St Clair Gibson, Fernando H Magalhães, Carlos Ugrinowitsch

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04317157 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Placebo Effects and Physical Performance: Central and Peripheral Mechanisms Investigated by Different Experimental Designs

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2022 to 2022Enrolled18ConditionsCaffeine, Placebo, BaselineArmsCaffeine, Placebo
NCT06533137 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating the Impact of Perceived Control on Placebo Effectiveness: A Comparison Between Classic and Self-Administered Placebo Paradigms

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETSRan2022 to 2024Enrolled84Conditions3 Placebo Groups in a Cycle Ergometer Session With Healthy ParticipantsArmsNeutral ginger-flavored drink described as energizing, hypoglycemic, caffeine-based drink, Neutral ginger-flavored drink
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. A Two-Level, Multidimensional Framework for Understanding and Treating Clinician Fatigue.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Comment on: "Caffeine and Exercise: What Next?"Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Flavio O PiresExercise Psychophysiology Research Group, School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos A S Dos AnjosNeurophysics Group, Gleb Wataghin Physics Institute, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Roberto J M CovolanNeurophysics Group, Gleb Wataghin Physics Institute, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Eduardo B FontesResearch Group in Physical Activity, Cognition and Behavior, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Timothy D NoakesSports Science Institute of South Africa, Department of Human Biology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Alan St Clair GibsonFaculty of Health and Science, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.
Fernando H MagalhãesExercise Psychophysiology Research Group, School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos UgrinowitschSchool of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Essex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caffeine (CAF) is an ergogenic aid used to improve exercise performance. Independent studies have suggested that caffeine may have the ability to increase corticospinal excitability, thereby decreasing the motor cortex activation required to generate a similar motor output. However, CAF has also been suggested to induce a prefrontal cortex (PFC) deoxygenation. Others have suggested that placebo (PLA) may trigger comparable effects to CAF, as independent studies found PLA effects on motor performance, corticospinal excitability, and PFC oxygenation. Thus, we investigated if CAF and CAF-perceived PLA may improve motor performance, despite the likely unchanged MC activation and greater PFC deoxygenation. Nine participants (26.4 ± 4.8 years old, VO

Indexed as

brain regulationfatigueperformanceprefrontal cortexVO2MAX

Identifiers

PMID30246799
PMCPMC6113857
OpenAlexW2885241567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.