Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30246497›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2018

Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis and Clinical Trial Simulation to Inform Dose Titration Decisions.

John David Clements, Juan Jose Perez Ruixo, John P Gibbs, Sameer Doshi, Carlos Perez Ruixo, Murad Melhem

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

John David ClementsClinical Pharmacology and Modeling & Simulation, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
Juan Jose Perez RuixoClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium.
John P GibbsClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, AbbVie, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Sameer DoshiClinical Pharmacology and Modeling & Simulation, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
Carlos Perez RuixoClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Murad MelhemClinical Pharmacology, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Amgen (United States) · USJanssen (Belgium) · BEAbbVie (United States) · USVertex Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimal dose selection in clinical trials is problematic when efficacious and toxic concentrations are close. A novel quantitative approach follows for optimizing dose titration in clinical trials. A system of pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and toxicity was simulated for scenarios characterized by varying degrees of different types of variability. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and clinical trial simulation (CTS) were used to optimize drug titration by maximizing efficacy/safety. The scenarios included were a low-variability base scenario, and high residual (20%), interoccasion (20%), interindividual (40%), and residual plus interindividual variability scenarios, and finally a shallow toxicity slope scenario. The percentage of subjects having toxicity was reduced by 87.4% to 93.5%, and those having efficacy was increased by 52.7% to 243%. Interindividual PK variability may have less impact on optimal cutoff values than other sources of variability. ROC/CTS methods for optimizing dose titration offer an individualized approach that leverages exposure-response relationships.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicROC CurveAlgorithmsDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansModels, BiologicalPharmacokineticsPharmacology

Identifiers

PMID30246497
PMCPMC6263661
OpenAlexW2893947360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.