Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30246245›Full record

ReviewEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2018

A fly in a tube: Macroevolutionary expectations for integrated phenotypes.

Ryan N Felice, Marcela Randau, Anjali Goswami

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
24.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Six million years of vole dental evolution shaped by tooth development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan N FeliceDepartment of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5DB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9201-9213
Marcela RandauDepartment of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5DB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5758-9336
Anjali GoswamiDepartment of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5DB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9465-810X
Natural History Museum · GB

Funding

ERC STG-2014-637171Leverhulme Trust RPG 2013-124SYNTHESIS FR-TAF-5635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotypic integration and modularity are ubiquitous features of complex organisms, describing the magnitude and pattern of relationships among biological traits. A key prediction is that these relationships, reflecting genetic, developmental, and functional interactions, shape evolutionary processes by governing evolvability and constraint. Over the last 60 years, a rich literature of research has quantified patterns of integration and modularity across a variety of clades and systems. Only recently has it become possible to contextualize these findings in a phylogenetic framework to understand how trait integration interacts with evolutionary tempo and mode. Here, we review the state of macroevolutionary studies of integration and modularity, synthesizing empirical and theoretical work into a conceptual framework for predicting the effects of integration on evolutionary rate and disparity: a fly in a tube. While magnitude of integration is expected to influence the potential for phenotypic variation to be produced and maintained, thus defining the shape and size of a tube in morphospace, evolutionary rate, or the speed at which a fly moves around the tube, is not necessarily controlled by trait interactions. Finally, we demonstrate this reduced disparity relative to the Brownian expectation for a given rate of evolution with an empirical example: the avian cranium.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBiological EvolutionModels, BiologicalAnimalsBirdsDipteraGenetic VariationSkullConstraintsdisparityevolutionary ratesmacroevolutionmodularityphenotypic integration

Identifiers

PMID30246245
PMCPMC6585935
OpenAlexW2893512807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.