Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30246150›Full record

ArticleEuropean stroke journal2018

PRECIOUS: PREvention of Complications to Improve OUtcome in elderly patients with acute Stroke. Rationale and design of a randomised, open, phase III, clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment.

Hendrik Reinink, Jeroen C de Jonge, Philip M Bath, Diederik van de Beek, Eivind Berge, Saskia Borregaard, Alfonso Ciccone, Laszlo Csiba, Jacques Demotes, Diederik W Dippel and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European stroke journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Action Plan for Stroke in Europe 2018-2030.European stroke journal · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Hendrik ReininkDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jeroen C de JongeDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Philip M BathStroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Diederik van de BeekDepartment of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eivind BergeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Saskia BorregaardClinical Trial Center North GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
Alfonso CicconeDepartment of Neurology and Stroke Unit, ASST di Mantova, Mantua, Italy.
Laszlo CsibaDepartment of Neurology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Jacques DemotesEuropean Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (ECRIN), Paris, France.
Diederik W DippelDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Janika KõrvDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Iwona Kurkowska-Jastrzebska2nd department of Neurology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland.
Kennedy R LeesInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Malcolm R MacleodDivision of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
George NtaiosDepartment of Medicine, Larissa University Hospital, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Gary RandallStroke Alliance for Europe (SAFE), Brussels, Belgium.
Götz ThomallaDepartment of Neurology, Center for Clinical Neurosciences, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
H Bart van der WorpDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElderly patients are at high risk of complications after stroke, such as infections and fever. The occurrence of these complications has been associated with an increased risk of death or dependency.

designInternational, 3 × 2-factorial, randomised-controlled, open-label clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment (PROBE) in 3800 patients aged 66 years or older with acute ischaemic stroke or intracerebral haemorrhage and an NIHSS score ≥ 6. Patients will be randomly allocated to any combination of oral, rectal, or intravenous metoclopramide (10 mg thrice daily); intravenous ceftriaxone (2000 mg once daily); oral, rectal, or intravenous paracetamol (1000 mg four times daily); or usual care, started within 24 h after symptom onset and continued for four days or until complete recovery or discharge from hospital, if earlier.

Indexed as

ceftriaxonecomplicationselderlymetoclopramideparacetamolStroke

Identifiers

PMID30246150
PMCPMC6120123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.