ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2018
Patient Perceptions of Surgeon Reimbursement for Rotator Cuff Repair.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cost analysis and complication rate comparing open, mini-open, and all arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies in the arthroplasty, spine, and shoulder and elbow literature have shown that patients perceive Medicare reimbursement to surgeons to be much higher than current reimbursement schedules. PURPOSE: To evaluate patient perceptions of surgeon reimbursement for various rotator cuff repair (RCR) procedures. STUDY
designCross-sectional study.
methodsWe surveyed 153 patients who presented to a single surgeon's orthopaedic sports medicine clinic between October 2016 and March 2017. Patients with a new complaint of hip or knee pain, those with a new complaint of shoulder pain, or those who had undergone shoulder surgery 1 year or more prior to their current visit were included. Patients were asked how much they thought surgeons should be reimbursed for RCR procedures, including arthroscopic repair of a simple tear and a massive tear as well as open repair of an acute tear and a chronic tear. They were also asked to estimate how much they thought surgeons were reimbursed by Medicare for these procedures. They were then given actual Medicare reimbursement rates for these procedures and asked whether they believed surgeons should be reimbursed that amount.
resultsFor arthroscopic repair of a rotator cuff tear, patients believed that surgeons should receive a mean (±SEM) reimbursement of US$5645 ± $442. This was significantly more than their estimate of what surgeons were actually reimbursed by Medicare ($3644 ± $408;
conclusionConsistent with previous literature, patients perceive Medicare reimbursement for RCR to be higher than what surgeons are actually reimbursed. As the United States health care system enters a bundled care environment, price transparency is increasingly important. This study indicates a need for patient education on how their health care costs are allocated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.