Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30245912›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of burns and trauma2018

New technologies in global burn care - a review of recent advances.

Laura Kearney, Eamon C Francis, Anthony Jp Clover

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of burns and trauma, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Silent Scars: Distinguishing the Psychiatric Morbidities Following Burn Injuries Between Males and Females.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pathophysiology of Severe Burn Injuries: New Therapeutic Opportunities From a Systems Perspective.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Contemporary Aspects of Burn Care.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Ethanol and Methanol Burn Risks in the Home Environment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura KearneyDepartment of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Cork University Hospital Wilton, Cork, Ireland.
Eamon C FrancisDepartment of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Cork University Hospital Wilton, Cork, Ireland.
Anthony Jp CloverDepartment of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Cork University Hospital Wilton, Cork, Ireland.
Cork University Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There have been truly incredible strides in the standard of burn care. The mortality from burn injuries has more than halved since the 1950s, making it hugely unique among major diseases of the developed world. There can be no doubt technology and technological advances have driven this process, dramatically improved every aspect of burn care, from the intensive care management, the surgical management, management of the healing wound to the post burn sequelae, specifically scar management. This review aims to identify key technological advances in burns, in both the developed and developing world, and evaluate their influence in the continued strategy to improve the standards of global burn care.

Indexed as

burn careglobal strategyTechnological advances

Identifiers

PMID30245912
PMCPMC6146166
OpenAlexW2988893505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.