Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30245852›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2018

Is Fitbit Charge 2 a feasible instrument to monitor daily physical activity and handbike training in persons with spinal cord injury? A pilot study.

M C Maijers, O Verschuren, J M Stolwijk-Swüste, C F van Koppenhagen, S de Groot, M W M Post

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Outcome Measures of Free-Living Activity in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation.Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M C Maijers1Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University |De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
O Verschuren1Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University |De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J M Stolwijk-Swüste1Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University |De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
C F van Koppenhagen2Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation in University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
S de GrootAmsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M W M Post1Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University |De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NLReade · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designIt is a longitudinal pilot study.

objectivesTo investigate the feasibility of a low-cost and widely used fitness tracker with step count and heart rate data to monitor daily physical activity in wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (SCI).

settingDutch community.

methodsSix participants with SCI who were in training for a handbike event were recruited. They were asked to wear a Fitbit Charge 2

resultsFive out of six participants managed to wear the device nonstop for 2 weeks, and continued to wear the device after this initial period. Most participants were enthusiastic about the direct feedback provided by the tracker and reported the data to be accurate. Data collected during more than 2 months of three participants and during 8 months on one of them showed the possibility of detecting training days and observing interpersonal and intrapersonal variation in daily physical activity level.

conclusionsA commercially available, low-cost, self-monitoring multi-sensor wrist device or a fitness tracker like the Fitbit Charge 2

Identifiers

PMID30245852
PMCPMC6134054
OpenAlexW2890355661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.