Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30245711›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2018

Machine Learning Creates a Simple Endoscopic Classification System that Improves Dysplasia Detection in Barrett's Oesophagus amongst Non-expert Endoscopists.

Vinay Sehgal, Avi Rosenfeld, David G Graham, Gideon Lipman, Raf Bisschops, Krish Ragunath, Manuel Rodriguez-Justo, Marco Novelli, Matthew R Banks, Rehan J Haidry and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopy.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Artificial intelligence in luminal endoscopy.Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vinay SehgalDepartment of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5700-8252
Avi RosenfeldDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Jerusalem College of Technology, Jerusalem, Israel.
David G GrahamDepartment of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Gideon LipmanDepartment of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Raf BisschopsDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Krish RagunathDepartment of Gastroenterology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Manuel Rodriguez-JustoDepartment of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5007-1761
Marco NovelliDepartment of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Matthew R BanksDepartment of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Rehan J HaidryDepartment of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Laurence B LovatDepartment of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBarrett's oesophagus (BE) is a precursor to oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC). Endoscopic surveillance is performed to detect dysplasia arising in BE as it is likely to be amenable to curative treatment. At present, there are no guidelines on who should perform surveillance endoscopy in BE. Machine learning (ML) is a branch of artificial intelligence (AI) that generates simple rules, known as decision trees (DTs). We hypothesised that a DT generated from recognised expert endoscopists could be used to improve dysplasia detection in non-expert endoscopists. To our knowledge, ML has never been applied in this manner.

methodsVideo recordings were collected from patients with non-dysplastic (ND-BE) and dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus (D-BE) undergoing high-definition endoscopy with

resultsVideos from 40 patients were collected including 12 both before and after acetic acid (ACA) application. Experts' average accuracy for dysplasia prediction was 88%. When experts' answers were entered into a DT, the resultant decision model had a 92% accuracy with a mean sensitivity and specificity of 97% and 88%, respectively. Addition of ACA did not improve dysplasia detection. Untrained medical students tended to have a high sensitivity but poor specificity as they "overcalled" normal areas. Gastroenterology trainees did the opposite with overall low sensitivity but high specificity. Detection improved significantly and accuracy rose in both groups after formal web-based training although it did it reach the accuracy generated by experts. For trainees, sensitivity rose significantly from 71% to 83% with minimal loss of specificity. Specificity rose sharply in students from 31% to 49% with no loss of sensitivity.

conclusionML is able to define rules learnt from expert opinion. These generate a simple algorithm to accurately predict dysplasia. Once taught to non-experts, the algorithm significantly improves their rate of dysplasia detection. This opens the door to standardised training and assessment of competence for those who perform endoscopy in BE. It may shorten the learning curve and might also be used to compare competence of trainees with recognised experts as part of their accreditation process.

Identifiers

PMID30245711
PMCPMC6136585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.