Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30245701›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2018

Does Late Maturity Alpha-Amylase Impact Wheat Baking Quality?

Marcus Newberry, Alexander B Zwart, Alex Whan, Jos C Mieog, May Sun, Emmett Leyne, Jenifer Pritchard, Sergio Nicolas Daneri-Castro, Kutty Ibrahim, Dean Diepeveen and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Late-Maturity Alpha-Amylase in Wheat (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marcus NewberryAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Alexander B ZwartData61, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Alex WhanAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Jos C MieogAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
May SunAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Emmett LeyneAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Jenifer PritchardAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Sergio Nicolas Daneri-CastroAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Kutty IbrahimAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Dean DiepeveenDepartment of Primary Industries and Regional Development, South Perth, WA, Australia.
Crispin A HowittAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Jean-Philippe F RalAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUAgriculture and Food · AUDepartment of Primary Industries and Regional Development · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Late maturity α-amylase (LMA) and pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) are both recognized as environmentally induced grain quality defects resulting from abnormally high levels of α-amylase. LMA is a more recently identified quality issue that is now receiving increasing attention worldwide and whose prevalence is now seen as impeding the development of superior quality wheat varieties. LMA is a genetic defect present in specific wheat genotypes and is characterized by elevated levels of the high pI TaAMY1 α-amylase, triggered by environmental stress during wheat grain development. TaAMY1 remains present in the aleurone through the harvest, lowering Falling Number (FN) at receival, causing a down-grading of the grain, often to feed grade, thus reducing the farmers' income. This downgrading is based on the assumption within the grain industry that, as for PHS, a low FN represents poor quality grain. Consequently any wheat line possessing low FN or high α-amylase levels is automatically considered a poor bread wheat despite there being no published evidence to date, to show that LMA is detrimental to end product quality. To evaluate the validity of this assumption a comprehensive evaluation of baking properties was performed from LMA prone lines using a subset of tall non-Rht lines from a multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross (MAGIC) wheat population grown at three different sites. LMA levels were determined along with quality parameters including end product functionality such as oven spring, bread loaf volume and weight, slice area and brightness, gas cell number and crumb firmness. No consistent or significant phenotypic correlation was found between LMA related FN and any of the quality traits. This manuscript provides for the first time, compelling evidence that LMA has limited impact on bread baking end product functionality.

Indexed as

bakingend product qualityFalling Numberlate maturity alpha-amylasewheat

Identifiers

PMID30245701
PMCPMC6137811
OpenAlexW2889774855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.