Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30245654›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2018

Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation.

Kent C Berridge

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05487885 (Anhedonia, Development, and Emotions), which is not on this map. Cited by 86 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05487885 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Anhedonia, Development, and Emotions: Phenotyping and Therapeutics (ADEPT) Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorErika ForbesRan2022 to 2025Enrolled123ConditionsDepression, AnhedoniaArmsContinuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), Positive Affect Training, Ketamine Injectable Solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 256 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kent C BerridgeDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Affective neuroscience of taste reactivityR01MH063649 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BERRIDGE, KENT C. · 2002 to 2024
$7.8M
Cue-triggered Reward SeekingR01DA015188 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BERRIDGE, KENT C. · 2003 to 2021
$4.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015188NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review takes a historical perspective on concepts in the psychology of motivation and emotion, and surveys recent developments, debates and applications. Old debates over emotion have recently risen again. For example, are emotions necessarily subjective feelings? Do animals have emotions? I review evidence that emotions exist as core psychological processes, which have objectively detectable features, and which can occur either with subjective feelings or without them. Evidence is offered also that studies of emotion in animals can give new insights into human emotions. Beyond emotion, motivation concepts have changed over decades too, and debates still continue. Motivation was once thought in terms of aversive drives, and reward was thought of in terms of drive reduction. Motivation-as-drive concepts were largely replaced by motivation-as-incentive concepts, yet aversive drive concepts still occasionally surface in reward neuroscience today. Among incentive concepts, incentive salience is a core motivation process, mediated by brain mesocorticolimbic systems (dopamine-related systems) and sometimes called 'wanting' (in quotation marks), to distinguish it from cognitive forms of desire (wanting without quotation marks). Incentive salience as 'wanting' is separable also from pleasure 'liking' for the same reward, which has important implications for several human clinical disorders. Ordinarily, incentive salience adds motivational urgency to cognitive desires, but 'wanting' and cognitive desires can dissociate in some conditions. Excessive incentive salience can cause addictions, in which excessive 'wanting' can diverge from cognitive desires. Conversely, lack of incentive salience may cause motivational forms of anhedonia in depression or schizophrenia, whereas a negatively-valenced form of 'fearful salience' may contribute to paranoia. Finally, negative 'fear' and 'disgust' have both partial overlap but also important neural differences.

Indexed as

addictiondisgustemotionfearhistory of psychologypsychological methodpsychological sciencereward

Identifiers

PMID30245654
PMCPMC6137142
OpenAlexW2890468836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.