Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30245579›Full record

ArticleChemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996)2017

Mechanisms and effectivity of sulfate reducing bioreactors using a chitinous substrate in treating mining influenced water.

Souhail R Al-Abed, Patricio X Pinto, John McKernan, Elisabeth Feld-Cook, Slawomir M Lomnicki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Souhail R Al-AbedNational Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States.
Patricio X PintoPegasus Technical Services, Inc., 46 East Hollister St, Cincinnati, OH 45219, United States.
John McKernanNational Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 West Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States.
Elisabeth Feld-CookDepartment of Chemistry, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, United States.
Slawomir M LomnickiDepartment of Environmental Sciences and LSU Superfund Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, United States.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mining-influenced water (MIW) is one of the main environmental challenges associated with the mining industry. Passive MIW remediation can be achieved through microbial activity in sulfate-reducing bioreactors (SRBRs), but their actual removal rates depend on different factors, one of which is the substrate composition. Chitinous materials have demonstrated high metal removal rates, particularly for the two recalcitrant MIW contaminants Zn and Mn, but their removal mechanisms need further study. We studied Cd, Fe, Zn, and Mn removal in bioactive and abiotic SRBRs to elucidate the metal removal mechanisms and the differences in metal and sulfate removal rates using a chitinous material as substrate. We found that sulfate-reducing bacteria are effective in increasing metal and sulfate removal rates and the duration of operation in SRBRs, and that the main mechanism involved was metal precipitation as sulfides. The solid residues provided evidence of the presence of sulfides in the bioactive column, more specifically ZnS, according to XPS analysis. The feasibility of passive treatments with a chitinous substrate could be an important option for MIW remediation.

Indexed as

Acid mine drainageAnaerobic bioreactorsPassive remediationSulfide

Identifiers

PMID30245579
PMCPMC6145482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.