ArticleNeurocomputing2018
Dynamic parallelism for synaptic updating in GPU-accelerated spiking neural network simulations.
Article in Neurocomputing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A spiking neural network model of the Superior Colliculus that is robust to changes in the spatial-temporal input.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Dynamic control of eye-head gaze shifts by a spiking neural network model of the superior colliculus.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- EDEN: A High-Performance, General-Purpose, NeuroML-Based Neural Simulator.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- Brian2CUDA: Flexible and Efficient Simulation of Spiking Neural Network Models on GPUs.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- Microstimulation in a spiking neural network model of the midbrain superior colliculus.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Analysis of Liquid Ensembles for Enhancing the Performance and Accuracy of Liquid State Machines.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Electrical stimulation in a spiking neural network model of monkey superior colliculus.Progress in brain research · 2019Article
- Double Stimulation in a Spiking Neural Network Model of the Midbrain Superior Colliculus.Frontiers in applied mathematics and statistics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Graphical processing units (GPUs) can significantly accelerate spiking neural network (SNN) simulations by exploiting parallelism for independent computations. Both the changes in membrane potential at each time-step, and checking for spiking threshold crossings for each neuron, can be calculated independently. However, because synaptic transmission requires communication between many different neurons, efficient parallel processing may be hindered, either by data transfers between GPU and CPU at each time-step or, alternatively, by running many parallel computations for neurons that do not elicit any spikes. This, in turn, would lower the effective throughput of the simulations. Traditionally, a central processing unit (CPU, host) administers the execution of parallel processes on the GPU (device), such as memory initialization on the device, data transfer between host and device, and starting and synchronizing parallel processes. The parallel computing platform CUDA 5.0 introduced dynamic parallelism, which allows the initiation of new parallel applications within an ongoing parallel kernel. Here, we apply dynamic parallelism for synaptic updating in SNN simulations on a GPU. Our algorithm eliminates the need to start many parallel applications at each time-step, and the associated lags of data transfer between CPU and GPU memories. We report a significant speed-up of SNN simulations, when compared to former accelerated parallelization strategies for SNNs on a GPU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.