Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30245541›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2018

A semiautomatic algorithm for three-dimensional segmentation of the prostate on CT images using shape and local texture characteristics.

Maysam Shahedi, Ling Ma, Martin Halicek, Rongrong Guo, Guoyi Zhang, David M Schuster, Peter Nieh, Viraj Master, Baowei Fei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Abdominal muscle segmentation from CT using a convolutional neural network.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maysam ShahediDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Ling MaDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Martin HalicekThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Rongrong GuoDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Guoyi ZhangDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
David M SchusterDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Peter NiehDepartment of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Viraj MasterDepartment of Urology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Baowei FeiDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Funding

ACADEMIC-INDUSTRIAL PARTNERSHIP FOR TRANSLATION OF PET/TRUS GUIDED INTERVENTIONR01CA204254 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI FEI, BAOWEI · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
MOLECULAR IMAGING DIRECTED, 3D ULTRASOUND-GUIDED, BIOPSY SYSTEMR01CA156775 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI FEI, BAOWEI · 2011 to 2016
$1.7M
Targeted fusion biopsy using anti-[18F]FACBC PET/CT and real-time 3D ultrasound gR21CA176684 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI FEI, BAOWEI, MASTER, VIRAJ · 2013 to 2014
$568k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA156775NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204254NCI NIH HHS R21 CA176684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate segmentation in computed tomography (CT) images is useful for planning and guidance of the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. However, the low soft-tissue contrast of CT images makes the manual prostate segmentation a time-consuming task with high inter-observer variation. We developed a semi-automatic, three-dimensional (3D) prostate segmentation algorithm using shape and texture analysis and have evaluated the method against manual reference segmentations. In a training data set we defined an inter-subject correspondence between surface points in the spherical coordinate system. We applied this correspondence to model the globular and smoothly curved shape of the prostate with 86, well-distributed surface points using a point distribution model that captures prostate shape variation. We also studied the local texture difference between prostate and non-prostate tissues close to the prostate surface. For segmentation, we used the learned shape and texture characteristics of the prostate in CT images and we used a set of user inputs for prostate localization. We trained our algorithm using 23 CT images and tested it on 10 images. We evaluated the results compared with those of two experts' manual reference segmentations using different error metrics. The average measured Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean absolute distance (MAD) were 88 ± 2% and 1.9 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. The averaged inter-expert difference measured on the same dataset was 91 ± 4% (DSC) and 1.3 ± 0.6 mm (MAD). With no prior intra-patient information, the proposed algorithm showed a fast, robust and accurate performance for 3D CT segmentation.

Identifiers

PMID30245541
PMCPMC6149524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.