Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30244885›Full record

ArticleNeuron2018

Communication from Learned to Innate Olfactory Processing Centers Is Required for Memory Retrieval in Drosophila.

Michael-John Dolan, Ghislain Belliart-Guérin, Alexander Shakeel Bates, Shahar Frechter, Aurélie Lampin-Saint-Amaux, Yoshinori Aso, Ruairí J V Roberts, Philipp Schlegel, Allan Wong, Adnan Hammad and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Sensory processing reformats odor coding around valence and dynamics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Michael-John DolanDivision of Neurobiology, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK; Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA.
Ghislain Belliart-GuérinGenes and Dynamics of Memory Systems, Brain Plasticity Unit, CNRS, ESPCI Paris, PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France.
Alexander Shakeel BatesDivision of Neurobiology, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
Shahar FrechterDivision of Neurobiology, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
Aurélie Lampin-Saint-AmauxGenes and Dynamics of Memory Systems, Brain Plasticity Unit, CNRS, ESPCI Paris, PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France.
Yoshinori AsoJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA.
Ruairí J V RobertsDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Philipp SchlegelDivision of Neurobiology, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK; Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Allan WongJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA.
Adnan HammadDivision of Neurobiology, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
Davi BockJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA.
Gerald M RubinJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA.
Thomas PreatGenes and Dynamics of Memory Systems, Brain Plasticity Unit, CNRS, ESPCI Paris, PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France.
Pierre-Yves PlaçaisGenes and Dynamics of Memory Systems, Brain Plasticity Unit, CNRS, ESPCI Paris, PSL Research University, 75005 Paris, France. Electronic address: pierre-yves.placais@espci.fr.
Gregory S X E JefferisDivision of Neurobiology, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK; Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK. Electronic address: jefferis@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
Medical Research Council MC_U105188491NIH HHS P40 OD018537Wellcome Trust 203261/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The behavioral response to a sensory stimulus may depend on both learned and innate neuronal representations. How these circuits interact to produce appropriate behavior is unknown. In Drosophila, the lateral horn (LH) and mushroom body (MB) are thought to mediate innate and learned olfactory behavior, respectively, although LH function has not been tested directly. Here we identify two LH cell types (PD2a1 and PD2b1) that receive input from an MB output neuron required for recall of aversive olfactory memories. These neurons are required for aversive memory retrieval and modulated by training. Connectomics data demonstrate that PD2a1 and PD2b1 neurons also receive direct input from food odor-encoding neurons. Consistent with this, PD2a1 and PD2b1 are also necessary for unlearned attraction to some odors, indicating that these neurons have a dual behavioral role. This provides a circuit mechanism by which learned and innate olfactory information can interact in identified neurons to produce appropriate behavior. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Indexed as

OdorantsAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedConnectomeDrosophilaMemoryMental RecallMushroom BodiesNerve NetSmellconnectomicsDrosophilainnate behaviorlateral hornlearningmemorymemory recallmushroom bodyneural circuitsolfaction

Identifiers

PMID30244885
PMCPMC6226615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.