Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30244877›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2018

Circulating Tumor Cell Assessment in Presumed Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A Prospective Pilot Study.

Melissa A Frick, Gary D Kao, Louise Aguarin, Chimbu Chinniah, Samuel Swisher-McClure, Abigail T Berman, William P Levin, Keith A Cengel, Cristina DeCesaris, Stephen M Hahn and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Early Diagnosis and Screening for Lung Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Review
  6. Multiblock Discriminant Analysis of IntegrativeInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa A FrickDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennslyvania.
Gary D KaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennslyvania.
Louise AguarinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennslyvania.
Chimbu ChinniahDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennslyvania.
Samuel Swisher-McClureDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennslyvania.
Abigail T BermanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennslyvania.
William P LevinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennslyvania.
Keith A CengelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennslyvania.
Cristina DeCesarisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Stephen M HahnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jay F DorseyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennslyvania.
Charles B SimoneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: charlessimone@umm.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Circulating Tumor Cells Analyses and Molecular Profiling for Patients Receiving Radiation TherapyR01CA201071 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DORSEY, JAY FITZGERALD, KAO, GARY D · 2016 to 2020
$2.2M
Targeted Modulation of the Death Receptor as a Therapeutic Strategy for GliomaK08NS076548 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DORSEY, JAY FITZGERALD · 2011 to 2015
$932k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA201071NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS076548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for presumed early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), detection and monitoring of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) may be useful for assessing treatment response safely and noninvasively. No published reports of CTC trends in this patient population exist to date. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with clinically diagnosed stage I NSCLC treated with SBRT were eligible for this institutional review board-approved prospective clinical trial. Peripheral blood samples were assayed for CTCs via a green fluorescent protein-expressing adenoviral probe. CTC positivity was defined as 1.3 green fluorescent protein-positive cells/mL of collected blood. Samples were obtained before (pre-radiation therapy [RT]), during, and after SBRT (post-RT; months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24). SBRT was delivered in ≤5 fractions (median dose of 50 Gy in 12.5 Gy fractions) to a biological equivalent dose of ≥100 Gy in all cases.

resultsForty-eight consecutive patients (T1a [73%], T1b [21%], and T2a [6%]) were enrolled. Median follow-up was 14.2 months. Twenty patients (42%) had a positive CTC level pre-RT, with a median CTC count of 4.2 CTCs per mL (interquartile range [IQR], 2.2-18.7). Of these 20 patients, 17 had evaluable post-RT CTC evaluations showing reduced CTC counts at 1 month (median, 0.2; IQR, 0.1-0.8) and 3 months (median, 0.6; IQR, 0-1.1). Three of these 17 patients experienced disease progression at a median of 19.9 months; all 3 experienced ≥1 positive post-RT CTC test predating clinical progression by a median of 16 months (range, 2-17 months). In contrast, among patients presenting with CTC-detectable disease and for whom all post-RT CTC tests were negative, none experienced recurrence or progression.

conclusionsCTC monitoring after SBRT for presumed early stage NSCLC may give lead-time notice of disease recurrence or progression. Conversely, negative CTC counts after treatment may provide reassurance of disease control. CTC analysis is thus potentially useful in enhancing clinical diagnosis and follow-up in this population.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingRadiosurgeryAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ProgressionDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleFluorescent DyesFollow-Up StudiesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalFluorescent DyesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsTelomerase

Identifiers

PMID30244877
PMCPMC6154509
OpenAlexW2809915782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.