Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30244672›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2018

Gendered norms of responsibility: reflections on accountability politics in maternal health care in Malawi.

Elsbet Lodenstein, Kyra Pedersen, Kondwani Botha, Jacqueline E W Broerse, Marjolein Dieleman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exploring community support on safe motherhood: A case of Lilongwe District, Malawi.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elsbet LodensteinAthena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, VU University and Royal Tropical Institute (KIT), P.O. Box 95001, 1090 HA, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. e.lodenstein@kit.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-3379-8488
Kyra PedersenVU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Kondwani BothaFoundation for Childrens' Rights (FCR), Mzuzu, Malawi.
Jacqueline E W BroerseAthena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, VU University, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marjolein DielemanAthena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, VU University and Royal Tropical Institute (KIT), P.O. Box 95001, 1090 HA, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

NWO/WOTRO Fund for Global Health Policy and Health Systems Research W07.45.201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper aims to provide insights into the role of traditional authorities in two maternal health programmes in Northern Malawi. Among strategies to improve maternal health, these authorities issue by-laws: local rules to increase the uptake of antenatal and delivery care. The study uses a framework of gendered institutions to critically assess the by-law content, process and effects and to understand how responsibilities and accountabilities are constructed, negotiated and reversed.

methodsFindings are based on a qualitative study in five health centre catchment areas in Northern Malawi. Data were collected using meeting observations and document search, 36 semi-structured individual interviews and 19 focus group discussions with female maternal health service users, male community members, health workers, traditional leaders, local officials and health committee members. A gender and power sensitive thematic analysis was performed focusing on the formulation, interpretation and implementation process of the by-laws as well as its effects on women and men.

resultsIn the study district, traditional leaders introduced three by-laws that oblige pregnant women to attend antenatal care; bring their husbands along and; and to give birth in a health centre. If women fail to comply with these rules, they risk being fined or denied access to maternal health services. The findings show that responsibilities and accountabilities are negotiated and that by-laws are not uniformly applied. Whereas local officials support the by-laws, lower level health cadres' and some community members contest them, in particular, the principles of individual responsibility and universality.

conclusionsThe study adds new evidence on the understudied phenomenon of by-laws. From a gender perspective, the by-laws are problematic as they individualise the responsibility for maternal health care and discriminate against women in the definition and application of sanctions. Through the by-laws, supported by national policies and international institutions, women bear the full responsibility for failures in maternal health care, suggesting a form of 'reversed accountability' of women towards global maternal health goals. This can negatively impact on women's reproductive health rights and obstruct ambitions to achieve gender inequality and health equity. Contextualised gender and power analysis in health policymaking and programming as well as in accountability reforms could help to identify these challenges and potential unintended effects.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesPoliticsSocial ResponsibilityAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansMalawiMaleMaternal HealthPregnancyPrenatal CareQualitative ResearchSexismSocioeconomic FactorsAccountabilityGenderGovernanceMaternal healthPower relationsSexual and reproductive health and rightsTraditional authorities

Identifiers

PMID30244672
PMCPMC6151921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.