Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30244514›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2019

How does it feel to be a problem? Patients' experiences of self-management support in New Zealand and Canada.

Nicolette F Sheridan, Timothy W Kenealy, Anita C Fitzgerald, Kerry Kuluski, Annette Dunham, Ann M McKillop, Allie Peckham, Ashlinder Gill

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How does it feel to be a problem? Patients' experiences of self-management support in New Zealand and Canada.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicolette F SheridanMassey University, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8098-2918
Timothy W KenealyUniversity of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Anita C FitzgeraldEncompass Research, Auckland, New Zealand.
Kerry KuluskiLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Annette DunhamUniversity of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ann M McKillopUniversity of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Allie PeckhamInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ashlinder GillUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Auckland · NZUniversity of Toronto · CAMassey University · NZStatistics New Zealand · NZ

Funding

CIHR TTF-128263Health Research Council of New Zealand 12/850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of long-term conditions is the "healthcare equivalent to climate change." People with long-term conditions often feel they are a problem, a burden to themselves, their family and friends. Providers struggle to support patients to self-manage. The Practical Reviews in Self-Management Support (PRISMS) taxonomy lists what provider actions might support patient self-management.

objectiveTo offer providers advice on how to support patient self-management.

designSemi-structured interviews with 40 patient-participants. SETTING AND

participantsThree case studies of primary health-care organizations in New Zealand and Canada serving diverse populations. Participants were older adults with long-term conditions who needed support to live in the community.

main outcome measuresQualitative description to classify patient narratives of self-management support according to the PRISMS taxonomy with thematic analysis to explore how support was acceptable and effective.

resultsPatients identified a relationship-in-action as the mechanism, the how by which providers supported them to self-manage. When providers acted upon knowledge of patient lives and priorities, these patients were often willing to try activities or medications they had resisted in the past. Effective self-management support saw PRISMS components delivered in patient-specific combinations by individual providers or teams. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsProviders who establish relationships with patients can support them to self-manage and improve health outcomes. Delivery of taxonomy components, in the absence of a relationship, is unlikely to be either acceptable or effective. Providers need to be aware that social determinants of health can constrain patients' options to self-manage.

Indexed as

Self-ManagementAgedCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandPatient ParticipationQuality of LifeSelf CareSocial Supportethnic minoritieslong-term conditionspatient-clinician relationshippatient preferencesPRISMS taxonomyself-management support

Identifiers

PMID30244514
PMCPMC6351408
OpenAlexW2892484735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.